e-Docket

Menu

• Details
• Docket Sheet
• Staff Assigned
• Service List
• Schedule
• Documents
• Public Comments

Entries

• Service - Complaint
  Copy of Complaint served to Respondent.
  12-0372 · 06/04/2012
• Filing - Formal Complaint
  Complaint, filed by Patrick Dillon. (mailed by June 2, 2012)
  12-0372 · 06/04/2012
• Filing - Appearance
  Appearance on behalf of Commonwealth Edison Company, filed by Mark L. Goldstein, P.C. (mailed by USPS - June 14, 2012)
  12-0372 · 06/18/2012
• Service - Setting/Prehearing Conference
  Set for Prehearing Conference by the Administrative Law Judge on July 9, 2012, in Chicago at 11:00 A.M. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 06/19/2012
• Hearing Report - Heard and Continued
  Heard by Administrative Law Judge Riley to August 16, 2012, in Chicago, at 10:00 A.M.
  12-0372 · 07/09/2012
• Transcript - Pending
  Transcript pending.
  12-0372 · 07/09/2012
• Service - Hearing Continuance Letter
  Hearing continued by the Administrative Law Judge to August 16, 2012, in Chicago at 10:00 A.M. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 07/10/2012
• Transcript - Received
  Transcript - July 9, 2012 received.
  12-0372 · 07/23/2012
• Service - Hearing Continuance Letter
  Status hearing scheduled for August 16, 2012, continued by the Administrative Law Judge to October 2, 2012, in Chicago at 11:00 A.M. Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judge that Complainant's objection, if any, to Respondent's motion to implead Illinois Bell is due by August 31, 2012. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 08/10/2012
• Filing - Motion
  Respondent's Motion to Implead AT&T as a Respondent and for Other Relief, filed by Mark L. Goldstein, P.C. (mailed by USPS - August 9, 2012)
  12-0372 · 08/16/2012
• Filing - Appearance
  Limited Appearance for Illinois Bell Telephone Company, filed. (Electronic)
  12-0372 · 08/20/2012
• Filing - Objection
  Verified Objection of AT&T Illinois to Motion to Implead or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed. (Electronic)
  12-0372 · 08/21/2012
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge that ComEd's response to the Verified Objection of AT&T Illinois to Motion to Implead or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss complaint, is due no later than September 7, 2012. Parties advised electronically.
  12-0372 · 08/23/2012
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge Complainant Patrick Dillon’s response to Respondent’s Motion to Implead AT&T and his response to AT&T’s Objection to the Motion to Implead are due no later than September 21, 2012. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 08/31/2012
• Filing - Reply
  Verified Reply of Commonwealth Edison Company to Verified Objection of AT&T Illinois to Motion to Implead or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss Complaint, filed by Mark L. Goldstein, P.C. (mailed by USPS - August 29, 2012)
  12-0372 · 08/31/2012
• Filing - Response
  Response to Respondent's Motion to Implead AT&T, Response to AT&T's Objection to the Motion to Implead and/or Response to Motion to Dismiss, filed by Patrick J. Dillon, Complainant. (mailed by USPS - September 11, 2012)
  12-0372 · 09/13/2012
• Filing - Reply
  Reply of AT&T Illinois In Support Of Its Motion, In the Alternative, To Dismiss Complaint, filed. (electronic)
  12-0372 · 09/18/2012
• Filing - Reply
  ComEd's Reply to Complainant's Response to Motion to Dismiss, filed by Mark L. Goldstein, P.C. (mailed by USPS - September 18, 2012)
  12-0372 · 09/20/2012
• Hearing Report - Continued w/o Hearing
  Case continued on Hearing Report by Administrative Law Judge Riley to November 20, 2012, in Chicago, at 11:30 A.M.
  12-0372 · 10/02/2012
• Hearing Report - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Commonwealth Edison company's Motion to Implead AT&T as a Respondent and for Other Relief is Denied.
  12-0372 · 10/02/2012
• Service - Hearing Continuance Letter
  Hearing continued by the Administrative Law Judge to November 20, 2012, in Chicago at 11:30 A.M. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 10/03/2012
• Filing - Motion
  Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and Other Relief, filed by Mark L. Goldstein, P.C. (Electronic)
  12-0372 · 11/16/2012
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge that Respondent’s Motion to Implead AT&T as a Respondent and for Other Relief is denied. AT&T’s Motion to Dismiss contained in its Verified Objection of AT&T Illinois to Implead or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss Complaint, is moot. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 11/15/2012
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge that Complainant’s response to the Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondent is due no later than November 30, 2012. Any reply by the Respondent thereafter is due no later than December 7, 2012. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 11/16/2012
• Hearing Report - Continued w/o Hearing
  Case continued on Hearing Report by Administrative Law Judge Riley to January 10, 2013, in Chicago, at 11:00 A.M.
  12-0372 · 11/20/2012
• Hearing Report - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Commonwealth Edison Company's Motion to Implead AT&T as a Respndent and for Other Relief is DENIED.
  12-0372 · 11/20/2012
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge that Complainant’s Reply to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss and Other Relief must be verified and must be filed with the Office of the Chief Clerk of the Commission. Complainant’s response must also contain the name of the Docket, Patrick Dillon v. Commonwealth Edison Company, and the Docket number, 12-0372, in the caption to the Reply. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 11/21/2012
• Service - Hearing Continuance Letter
  Hearing continued by the Adminstrative Law Judge to January 10, 2013, in Chicago at 11:00 A.M. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 11/26/2012
• Filing - Reply
  Reply to the Responent's Motion to Dismiss, filed by Patrick Dillon. (mailed by USPS - December 4, 2012)
  12-0372 · 12/06/2012
• Filing - Response
  Verified Response to Complainant's Reply to Resondent's Motion to Dismiss, filed by Mark L. Goldstein, P.C. (mailed by USPS - December 13, 2012)
  12-0372 · 12/17/2012
• Filing - Reply
  Reply to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss filed by Complainant, Patrick Dillon. (mailed by USPS Priority Mail - Dec. 19, 2012)
  12-0372 · 12/24/2012
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss and Other Relief is denied. Hearing continued by the Administrative Law Judge to January 10, 2013, in Chicago at 11:00 A.M., for evidentiary. Notice further given by the Administrative Law Judge that the Complainant will be required to proceed first and produce all testimony, documents and other evidence relevant to the complaint. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 01/02/2013
• Hearing Report - Heard and Taken-Yes
  Heard by Administrative Law Judge Riley and Taken.
  12-0372 · 01/10/2013
• Hearing Report - Exhibits
  e-Docket: Complainant’s Exhibits: 1. 92 Ill. Adm. Code Ch. I, subchapter f; 2. IDOT Highway Jurisdiction Guidelines; 3. Photos of utility pole, driveway, alley and Berwyn Ave. Respondent’s Exhibits: 1. Photos of utility pole, driveway, alley and Berwyn Ave.; 2. Situation Sketch; 3. ComEd letter to Complainant 4/4/12; 4. Ill.C.C. No. 10 2nd Revised Sheet No. 154; 5. Maintenance Designations; 7. Ill.C.C. No. 10 Original Sheet No. 277; 8. Ill.C.C. No. 10 Original Sheet No. 156.
  12-0372 · 01/10/2013
• Transcript - Pending
  Transcript pending.
  12-0372 · 01/10/2013
• Transcript - Received
  Transcript - January 10, 2013, received.
  12-0372 · 01/25/2013
• Service - Notice
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge that Respondent is directed to file late-filed Exhibit 6, Franchise Agreement, with the Office of the Chief Clerk instanter. Copies shall also be provided to the Complainant and to the Administrative Law Judge. Complainant shall have ten days from the date late-filed Exhibit 6 posts on the Commission’s e-Docket system in which to file an objection. Respondent shall have five days from the date the objection is filed to reply. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 02/22/2013
• Filing - Objection
  Objection to the Respondent's Late-Filed Exhibit #6, filed by Patrick Dillon. (mailed by USPS - March 14, 2013)
  12-0372 · 03/18/2013
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given by the Administrative Law Judge that Respondent’s reply to Complainant’s objection to the admission of Complainant’s late-filed Exhibit 6 shall be filed no later than March 29, 2013. Notice served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 03/20/2013
• Filing - Reply
  Respondent's Reply to Complainant's Objection to ComEd Late-Filed Exhibit 6, filed by Mark L. Goldstein, P.C. (mailed by USPS - March 22, 2013)
  12-0372 · 03/25/2013
• Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling
  Notice given Respondent's late-filed Exhibit 6 is admitted into evidence over Complainant's written objection; please add that the concluding paragraph of Complainant's objection does not address the motion to admit late-filed Exhibit 6 and will not be considered by the Administrative Law Judge. Parties advised electronically.
  12-0372 · 03/29/2013
• Service - Proposed Order
  Attached Proposed Order served electronically to parties.
  12-0372 · 04/11/2013