Case Number: 12-0293

  • 02/14/2013
    Service - Record

    Certified Copy of Appeal Record forwarded to the Honorable Carla Bender, Clerk, Appellate Fourth Judicial District, Springfield. (4-13-0029)
  • 01/15/2013
    Commission Action - General

    The Commission in conference DENIED the Application for Rehearing of the People of the State of Illinois and AARP, filed on January 14, 2013.
  • 01/15/2013
    Service - Commission Action

    Notice of Commission Action served electronically to parties advising of the action of the Commission on January 15, 2013.
  • 01/11/2013
    Service - Appeal

    Copy of Notice of Appeal and Certified Orders mailed to the Office of General Counsel, Illinois Commerce Commission, Attn: Mary Stephenson-Schroeder. Letter only mailed to the Honorable Lisa Madigan, Attorney General, State of Illinois.
  • 01/11/2013
    Service - Court

    Copy of Notice of Appeal and Certified Orders mailed to the Honorable Carla Bender
    Clerk, Appellate Court
    Fourth Judicial District, Springfield.
  • 01/10/2013
    Service - Commission Action

    Notice of Commission Action served electronically to parties advising of the action of the Commission on January 9, 2013.
  • 01/10/2013
    Filing - Notice of Appeal

    Notice of Appeal on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP of the Commission Order entered on December 5, 2012, and the Commission Decision entered on January 9, 2013. 4-13-0029 (Electronic)
  • 01/10/2013
    Filing - Petition for Review

    Ameren Illinois Company's Petition for Review, filed by Whitt Strutevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 01/09/2013
    Commission Action - General

    The Commission in conference DENIED the Application for Rehearing of Ameren Illinois Company, filed on December 21, 2012.
  • 01/04/2013
    Filing - Petition for Rehearing

    Application for Rehearing of the People of the State of Illinois and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 12/21/2012
    Filing - Petition for Rehearing

    Application for Rehearing of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Whitt & Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 12/21/2012
    Filing - Petition for Rehearing-Amended

    Corrected Application for Rehearing of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 12/12/2012
    Transcript - Received

    ORAL ARGUMENT Transcript - November 28, 2012, received.

  • 12/06/2012
    Service - Order

    Copy of Final Order served electronically to parties.
  • 12/05/2012
    Order Entered - Final

    Final Order entered.
  • 12/04/2012
    Filing - Motion

    People of the State of Illinois’ and AARP Motion for Leave to File Instanter, filed. (Electronic)
  • 12/03/2012
    Filing - Notice

    Corrected Notice of Legislative Action, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 11/30/2012
    Filing - Notice

    Notice of Legislative Action
    filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (electronic)
  • 11/28/2012
    Oral Argument - Heard and Taken Under Advisement

    Oral Argument Heard by the Commission and Taken under Advisement.
  • 11/28/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Errata to Motion to Strike of Ameren Illinois Company, filed. (Electronic)
  • 11/27/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Strike, or in the Alternative, to File Reply Brief, of Ameren Illinois Company, filed. (Electronic)
  • 11/27/2012
    Service - Notice

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges of the attached Oral Argument Schedule. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 11/21/2012
    Service - Notice

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that Oral Argument is scheduled for November 28, 2012, in Springfield, at 1:30 P.M. Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges of the instructions set out by the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) with respect to Oral Argument. Consistent with Section 200.850(b) of the Rules of Practice, Oral Argument will be limited to parties having filed briefs in this Docket. In addition to the requirements contained in Section 200.850(c) of the Rules of Practice, the Commission herein sets the following additional guidelines: (1) The scope of Oral Argument is as follows: Rate recovery of expenses for Ameren’s 2011 electric rate case filed under Section 9-201 of the Act (Docket No. 11-0279);
    The appropriate method for determining Ameren’s capital structure; The appropriate ratemaking treatment for Ameren’s deferred state income tax expense. (2) Ameren will have 25 minutes for its argument, while any other party wishing to argue these issues will have 20 minutes. The allotted time includes Commissioner questions and responses from counsel. Parties may reserve time for rebuttal. Unless parties have filed joint briefs in this Docket, parties are prohibited from pooling or sharing their time allotment. (3) Irrespective of the issues listed above, the parties should be prepared to answer any question regarding the record or the pertinent law.
    (4) Parties intending to present Oral Argument must notify Brian Granahan (bgranahan@icc.illinois.gov), ALJ Albers (jalbers@icc.illinois.gov), and ALJ Yoder (syoder@icc.illinois.gov) with a list of attorneys presenting Oral Argument, and on which topics presentations will be made, by 5:00 P.M. on Monday, November 26, 2012. (5) Parties presenting arguments shall provide Mr. Granahan and ALJs Albers and Yoder with exhibits, if any, that will be used for Oral Argument by 5:00 P.M. on Monday, November 26, 2012.
    (6) If an attorney is in need of an accommodation for any visual aid, counsel must inform Mr. Granahan and ALJs Albers and Yoder by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 26, 2012, as to the specifics of the accommodation needed. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 11/20/2012
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 11/20/2012
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED (Electronic)
  • 11/20/2012
    Filing - Notice

    Ameren Illinois Company's Notice of Oral Argument, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 11/20/2012
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 11/20/2012
    Filing - Response

    Response to Administrative Law Judge's Post Record Data Request Dated November 7, 2012, filed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 11/07/2012
    Service - Proposed Order

    Attached Proposed Order served electronically to parties.
  • 11/07/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that Commission Staff’s October 4, 2012 “Motion to Correct the Cross Exhibit of Staff Filed by the Court Reporter on September 13, 2012” has been granted.
    Notice is also given that the September 19, 2012
    “Verified Motion of Ameren Illinois Company to Maintain Protection of Confidential and Proprietary Information” is granted in part and denied in part. The following information on AG/AARP Ex. 3.4 (and any other exhibit containing same) shall be granted confidential treatment:
    1) the dollar figure at the top of page 8 of 40,
    2) the dollar figure at the top of page 9 of 40, 3) the dollar figure at the top of page 10 of 40, 4) the four dollar figures on page 13 of 40, 5) the four dollar figures on page 14 of 40,
    6) the contents of page 20 of 40, and 7) the pie chart on page 22 of 40 depicting the relative proportion of the factors influencing Ameren stock price.
    No other information on the exhibits at issue shall be redacted. Those parties sponsoring any exhibits affected by this ruling shall file new unredacted public and redacted confidential versions of those exhibits no later than November 30, 2012. When making any such filing, the filing party shall make clear that the filing is made in compliance with this ruling. Notice is further given of the attached Post Record Data Request. Parties advised electronically.
  • 10/15/2012
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Position Statement and Draft Order of the People of the State of Illinois and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/12/2012
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Revised Reply Brief of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/12/2012
    Filing - Reply

    Reply in Support of Verified Motion of Ameren Illinois Company to Maintain Protection of Confidential and Proprietary Information, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 10/12/2012
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Position Statement of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/12/2012
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Position Statement and Suggested Conclusions of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2012
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2012
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2012
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the People of the State of Illinois and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2012
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/04/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Correct the Cross Exhibit of Staff filed by the Court Reporter on September 13, 2012, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/03/2012
    Filing - Opposition

    The People of the State Of Illinois’ Opposition to Ameren’s Verified Motion to Maintain Protection of Confidential and Proprietary Information, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/28/2012
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 14, 2012, received.
  • 09/28/2012
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/28/2012
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief on Behalf of the People of the State of Illinois and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/28/2012
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/28/2012
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 09/27/2012
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 13, 2012, received.
  • 09/26/2012
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 12, 2012, received.
  • 09/25/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the attached outline shall be used by all parties submitting an Initial Brief and/or Reply Brief. Those parties not addressing a particular issue shall not renumber the outline. Such parties shall simply leave blank those issues they are not addressing. Parties advised electronically.
  • 09/24/2012
    Filing - Errata

    Ameren Illinois Company's Errata to its September 19, 2012 Motion to Maintain Protection of Confidential and Proprietary Information, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 09/24/2012
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 10, 2012, received.
  • 09/21/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice is given by the Administrative Law Judges that the deadline for the submission of the joint proposed outline has been extended from September 21, 2012 to September 24, 2012.
    Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges that the deadline for submission of Initial Briefs has been extended from September 27, 2012 to September 28, 2012. otice is further given by the Administrative Law Judges that any response to Ameren Illinois Company’s September 19, 2012 motion seeking confidential treatment for portions of AG/AARP Ex. 3.4 and AG/AARP/AIC Cross Ex. 1 must be received by October 3, 2012. Any reply thereto must be received by October 12, 2012. otice is further given by the Administrative Law Judges that AG/AARP Ex. 3.1 Revised is admitted into the record. Parties advised electronically.
  • 09/19/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Verified Motion of Ameren Illinois Company to Maintain Protection of Confidential and Proprietary Information, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 09/14/2012
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued generaly.
  • 09/14/2012
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: AG/AARP Ex. 2.0--2.1 - direct testimony of D. Effron - filed 7/3/12
    AG/AARP Ex. 4.0--4.1 - rebuttal testimony of D. Effron - filed 8/28/12

    AIC Ex. 3.0 - direct testimony of M. Getz - filed 4/20/12
    AIC Ex. 20.0 - rebuttal testimony of M. Getz - filed 9/5/12
    AIC Ex. 20.1 - affidavit of M. Getz - filed 9/17/12

    AIC Ex. 7.0--7.2 - direct testimony of L. Jones - filed 4/20/12
    AIC Ex. 16.0 - rebuttal testimony of L . Jones - filed 7/31/12
    AIC Ex. 16.1 - affidavit of L. Jones - filed 9/13/12

    AIC Ex. 10.0 - rebuttal testimony of R. Mill - filed 7/31/12
    AIC Ex. 10.1 - affidavit of R. Mill - filed 9/13/12

    AIC Ex. 5.0--5.1 - direct testimony of S. Ogden - filed 4/20/12
    AIC Ex. 5.2 - affidavit of S. Ogden - filed 9/12/12

    AIC Ex. 4.0--4.1 - direct testimony of R. Pate - filed 4/20/12
    AIC Ex. 4.2 - affidavit of R. Pate - filed 9/12/12

    AIC Ex. 8.0--8.3 - direct testimony of R. Schonhoff - filed 4/20/12
    AIC Ex. 8.4 - affidavit of R. Schonhoff - filed 9/12/12

    AIC Ex. 6.0--6.1 - direct testimony of S. Verbest - filed 4/20/12
    AIC Ex. 6.2 - affidavit of S. Verbest - filed 9/12/12

    AIC Ex. 15.0 REV - rebuttal testimony of J. Warren - filed 8/22/12
    AIC Ex. 23.0 - surrebuttal testimony of J. Warren - filed 9/5/12
    AIC Ex. 23.1 - affidavit of J. Warren - filed 9/13/12

    AIC Late Filed Ex. 1 (Staff DRs TEE 3.02, 3.02ATT, 3.02S, 3.02S Atts 1-7) (re: 11-0279 expenses) (public & confiddential versions) - filed 9/13/12
    AIC Late Filed Ex. 2 (Staff DRs TEE 6.01, 6.01S, 6.01 Atts 1-5) (re: 12-0001 expenses) (public & confidential versions) - filed 9/13/12
    AG Cross Ex. 1 (AG DR 1.06, including response to Staff DR TEE 1.05) (public version) - filed 9/13/12
    AG Cross Ex. 2 (AG DR 1.07 & 1.07 Att) (public version) - filed 9/13/12
  • 09/14/2012
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    AG Cross Ex. 1 (AG DR 1.06, including response to Staff DR TEE 1.05) (confidential version)
    AG Cross Ex. 2 (AG DR 1.07 & 1.07 Att) (confidential version)
    AG Cross Ex. 3 (AG DR 1.08)
  • 09/14/2012
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/13/2012
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued to September 14, 2012, in Springfield, at 9:00 A.M.
  • 09/13/2012
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: AIC Exh. 2.0-Direct Testimony of Ryan Martin-filed 4/20/12
    AIC Exh. 12.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Ryan Martin-filed 7/31/12 with Exh. 12.1 and 12.2
    AIC Exh. 21.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Ryan Martin-filed 9/5/12

    AIC Exh. 1.0-Direct Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 4/20/12 with Exh. 1.1-1.6
    AIC Exh. 11.0R-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 8/22/12 with Exh. 11.5R
    AIC Exh. 11.1-11.4-filed 7/31/12
    AIC Exh. 19.0R-Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 9/5/12 with Exh. 19.1-19.5


    Sch. 3.01-3.04 filed 7/3/12 Sch. 3.04 both confidential and public, and Att. A and B
    Staff Exh. 3.0R-Revised Direct Testimony of Karen Chang-filed 7/17/12 Att. A Corrected
    Staff Exh. 8.0R-C-Revised Corrected Rebuttal Testimony of Karen Chang-filed 9/6/12 with Sch. 8.01 and 8.02 and Att. A

    Staff Exh. 4.0-Direct Testimony of Rochelle Phipps-filed 7/3/12 with Sch. 4.01-4.06
    Staff Exh. 9.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Rochelle Phipps-filed 8/28/12 with Sch. 9.01-9.02 and Att. A-C

    Staff Exh. 1.0-Direct Testimony of Theresa Ebrey-filed 7/3/12 with Sch. 1.01-1.11 and Att. A-E
    Staff Exh. 6.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Theresa Ebrey-filed 8/28/12 with Sch. 6.01-6.14 and Att. A

    Staff Exh. 10.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Mary Everson-filed 8/28/12 with Sch. 10.01 and Att. A-D
    Staff Exh. 10.1-Affidavit of Mary Everson-filed 9/13/12

    Staff Exh. 5.0-Direct Testimony of William Johnson-filed 7/3/12
    Staff Exh. 5.1-Affidavit of William Johnson-filed 9/12/12


    AG/AARP Exh. 1.0-Direct Testimony of Michael Brosch-filed 7/3/12 with Exh. 1.1 to 1.9, Exh. 1.4 both public and confidential
    AG/AARP Exh. 3.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Michael Brosch-filed 8/28/12 with Exh. 3.2-3.4, 3.4 confidential
    AG/AARP Exh. 3.1 Revised-filed 9/14/12

    CUB Ex. 1.0-DIrect testimony of R. Smith with Ex. 1.1, 1.2 (filed 7/3/12) & 1.3 confidential (filed 8/8/12)
    CUB Ex. 2.0 Corrected-Rebuttal testimony of R. Smith (filed 9/10/12) with Ex. 2.1(filed 8/28/12)
  • 09/13/2012
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    Staff Group Cross-Exh. 5-portions of Ameren investor reports, response to Data Requests RMP 1.02 Att. 1;1.05 Att. 7; 4.01, 5.02 and 5.03
    Staff Group Cross-Exh. 6-AIC Response to Data Request RMP 4.01
    Staff Cross-Exh. 7-AIC Response to Data Requet TEE 2.06

    AIC Cross-Exh. 2-IRS Publication 526-Charitable Contributions
    AIC Cross-Exh. 3-Excerpt from IRS code on charitable contributions
    AIC Cross-Exh. 4-Staff Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 8.02 and 8.03
    AIC Cross-Exh 5-Excerpt from Moody's Ameren report 6/13/12
    AIC Cross-Exh. 6-excerpt from Fitch ratings report
    AIC Cross Ex. 7 -FASB Int. No. 48
    AIC Cross Ex. 8 -AIC-CUB DR 2.05
    AIC Cross Ex. 9 -AIC-CUB DR 2.06
  • 09/13/2012
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/12/2012
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued to September 13, 2012, in Springfield, at 9:00 A.M.
  • 09/12/2012
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: AIC Exh. 9.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Craig Nelson-filed 7/31/12 with App. A
    AIC Exh. 18.0R-Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Craig Nelson-filed 9/10/12 with Exh. 18.1

    AIC Exh.13.0-Rebuttal Testimony of David Heintz-filed 7/31/12 with Exh. 13.1 and 13.2
    AIC Exh. 22.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of David Heintz-filed 9/5/12 with Exh. 22.1

    AIC Exh. 17.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Geralynn Lord-filed 7/31/12
    AIC Exh. 25.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Geralynn Lord-filed 9/5/12 with Exh. 25.1 and 25.2

    AIC Exh. 14.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Kathleen Pagel-filed 7/31/12 with Exh. 14.1 to 14.4
    AIC Exh. 24.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Kathleen Pagel-filed 9/5/12 with Exh. 24.1 to 24.3


    Staff Exh. 2.0C-Corrected Direct Testimony of Daniel Kahle-filed 8/20/12 with Sch. 2.01 -2.02 and Att. A-E
    Staff Exh. 7.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Daniel Kahle-filed 8/28/12 with Sch. 7.01
  • 09/12/2012
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    Staff Cross-Exh. 1-AIC Response to Staff Data Request TEE 10.02
    Staff Cross-Exh. 2-AIC Response to Staff Data Request TEE 10.01
    Staff Cross-Exh. 3-AIC Response to Staff Data Request KC 17.03
    Staff Cross-Exh. 4-AIC response to Data Request MHE 6.01 and 6.02

    AIC Cross-Exh. 1-Excerpt from transcript in Docket No. 12-0001

    Joint AG/AARP/AIC-Cross-Exh. 1-both confidential and public versions-AIC Responses to Data Request AG 6.24
  • 09/12/2012
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/10/2012
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judge Albers and continued to September 12, 2012, in Springfield, at 10:00 A.M.
  • 09/10/2012
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/10/2012
    Filing - Errata

    2nd Errata on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/06/2012
    Filing - Errata

    Errata to the Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Staff Witness Karen Chang of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/05/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the following requirements and procedures are in place in preparation for the evidentiary hearing and the remainder of this docket: 1) All parties are directed to cooperate and submit to the Administrative Law Judges by 12:00 PM September 11, 2012 a joint list of witnesses indicating on which day each witness is expected to testify and the anticipated duration of cross-examination of each witness by each party.
    2) For any witness for whom no party has any questions, parties are reminded to ask the Administrative Law Judges whether they have any questions for such a witness before planning to admit that witness’ testimony via affidavit. 3) When testimony is to be offered in conjunction with an affidavit, if the affidavit is not already part of the witness’ testimony, the affidavit must be marked as an exhibit as well. 4) With regard to any witness that has any non-substantive corrections to their testimony, parties are advised to simply submit an errata rather than file a motion for leave to correct the errors. In the event that corrections are made to testimony prior to the evidentiary hearing, a corrected version of the testimony must either be (a) filed on e-Docket or (b) brought to the evidentiary hearing. 5) On the first day of the evidentiary hearing, each party must provide a list of the exhibits it intends to offer into the record. If an exhibit was filed on e-Docket, the date on which it was filed and an indication of whether it is a corrected, revised, or confidential exhibit must be provided as well. Cross exhibits that a party may offer at the evidentiary hearing need not be included on the list. Each party should be prepared to disseminate copies of its exhibit list to all other parties at the hearing. The exhibit list need not be filed on e-Docket. 6) With regard to any confidential designations, parties shall be prepared to explain/justify any such designations. 7) All parties are directed to cooperate and submit to the Administrative Law Judges by September 21, 2012 a joint proposed outline for use in the briefs. The outline shall reflect issues that have been resolved as well as those that remain contested. If it is not obvious what a particular entry on the outline represents, a note shall be included indicating what is intended. 8) With regard to any witness that has had only a portion of his/her testimony stricken, the remaining testimony shall be resubmitted as a revised document retaining the line numbers associated with the stricken testimony. For each blank area, an appropriate notation shall be made indicating that the space is intentionally left blank following the striking of the offered testimony. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 08/22/2012
    Filing - Errata

    Errata of Ameren Illinois Company, filed. (Electronic)
  • 08/20/2012
    Filing - Errata

    Errata to the Direct Testimony of Staff Witness Daniel G. Kahle of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 08/17/2012
    Filing - Appearance

    Entry of Appearance on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, filed. (Electronic)
  • 08/07/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the August 1, 2012 “Revised Verified Motion of Ameren Illinois Company to Remove Instanter Confidential Information from the Public Record” is granted. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 08/01/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Revised Verified Motion of Ameren Illinois Company to Remove Instanter Confidential Information from the Public Record, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 07/31/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that any objections to Ameren Illinois’ Motion to Remove Instanter Confidential Information from the Public Record shall be filed by August 6, 2012. Any replies to objections are to be filed by August 9, 2012. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 07/27/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Verified Motion of Ameren Illinois Company to Remove Instanter Confidential Information from the Public Record, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (electronic)
  • 07/05/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given that the Administrative Law Judges have granted the July 3, 2012 “Verified Petition to Intervene of AARP and Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice.” Notice also given that pursuant to 83 Ill. Adm. Code 200.430 and 200.605, a document identified as proprietary shall be accompanied by a public version of the document with only that information warranting proprietary treatment being redacted. Accordingly, completely redacting a document is generally not acceptable. To that end, the parties that submitted the following documents on July 3, 2012 shall resubmit the public version of each document with only that information truly warranting proprietary treatment being redacted. Any party behind the designation of the information as proprietary is directed to work with the filing party responding to this ruling. The properly redacted documents must be filed no later than July 20, 2012. Staff Exhibit 3.0, Attachment A; Citizens Utility Board Exhibit 1.3, page 8, 9, and 10; and
    Attorney General/AARP Exhibit 1.4. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 07/03/2012
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene of AARP and Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filed by John B. Coffman, LLC. (Electronic)
  • 06/20/2012
    Filing - Response

    Ameren Illinois Company's Response (by Letter) to ALJs' Deficiency dated May 23, 2012, filed. (Electronic)
  • 06/12/2012
    Service - Notice

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges of the attached Case Management Plan. Parties advised electronically.
  • 06/01/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company's Corrected Amended Motion for Entry of Case Management Order, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 05/31/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company's Amended Motion for Entry of Case Management Order, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 05/31/2012
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - May 16, 2012, received.
  • 05/31/2012
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given that the Administrative Law Judges adopt for use in this proceeding the attached “Terms Governing Protection of Confidential Information.” Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges that any responses to Ameren Illinois Company’s May 31, 2012 “Amended Motion for Entry of Case Management Order” must be received by June 6, 2012 and any replies thereto must be received by June 8, 2012. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 05/30/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company's Amended Motion for Entry of a Protective Order filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (electronic)
  • 05/30/2012
    Filing - Appearance

    Notice of Appearance filed on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois. (electronic)
  • 05/21/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company’s Motion for Entry of Case Management Order, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 05/17/2012
    Filing - Errata

    Errata of Ameren Illinois Company to Rate MAP-P Modernization Action Plan - Pricing Annual Update Filing, filed. (Hand Delivered)
  • 05/16/2012
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judge Albers and continued to September 10, 2012, in Springfield, at 10:00 A.M.
  • 05/16/2012
    Hearing Report - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Granted the following: Petition to Intervene of the Citizens Utility Board (filed 05/01/15). Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice concerning Christopher Kennedy (filed 04/30/12).
  • 05/16/2012
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 05/04/2012
    Service - Setting/Prehearing Conference

    Set for Prehearing Conference by the Administrative Law Judge on May 16, 2012, in Springfield at 1:30 P.M. Parties advised by letter.
  • 05/01/2012
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 04/30/2012
    Filing - Appearance

    Appearance on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP. (Electronic)
  • 04/30/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filed by Whitt Sturtevant LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 04/23/2012
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company's Motion for Entry of a Protective Order, filed. (Electronic)
  • 04/20/2012
    Filing - Petition/Application

    Verified Petition, filed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Hand Delivered)