Case Number: 11-0279

  • 01/05/2012
    Order Entered - Final

    Final Order entered.
  • 01/05/2012
    Service - Order

    Copy of Final Order served electronically to parties.
  • 01/04/2012
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Ameren Illinois Company's Revised Post Exceptions Proposed Order, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 01/04/2012
    Service - Notice

    Notice given that the Administrative Law Judges have severed Docket No. 11-0279 and Docket No. 11-0282 on their own motion pursuant to 83 Ill. Adm. Code 200.600. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 01/03/2012
    Filing - Withdraw

    Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Electric Tariffs, filed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 01/03/2012
    Service - Notice

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that no later than 3:00 P.M. Wednesday, January 4, 2012, Ameren Illinois Company shall file a version of the attached post-exceptions proposed order in this matter reflecting in legislative style its suggestions for revising the post-exceptions proposed order in light of the withdrawal of Docket No. 11-0279. Any other party to this proceeding may file their suggestions as well in the same manner by the same deadline. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 01/03/2012
    Service - Notice

    Notice given that in light of the recently enacted requirements of 220 ILCS 5/16-108.5(c), the instructions set out by the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) with respect to Oral Argument for Docket Nos. 11-0279 and 11-0282 (cons.), Ameren Illinois Company’s Proposed General Increase in Electric and Natural Gas Rates, are revised as set forth below. Oral Argument remains scheduled for Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 1:00 P.M. in Springfield, Illinois. Consistent with Section 200.850(b) of the Rules of Practice, Oral Argument will be limited to parties having filed briefs in this docket.
    In addition to the requirements contained in Section 200.850(c) of the Rules of Practice, the Commission herein sets the following additional guidelines:
    (1) The scope of Oral Argument is as follows:
    a. Return on Equity;
    b. The Adjustments to Ameren’s Rate Case Expense; and
    c. The Adjustments to Ameren’s Charitable Contributions.
    (2) Oral argument will be structured as noticed in the attached revised schedule.
    January 3, 2012 11-0279c
    Page 2
    (3) In addition to the issues listed above, the parties should be prepared to answer any question regarding the record or the pertinent law. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 12/29/2011
    Service - Notice

    Noticegiven of the instructions set out by the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) with respect to Oral Argument for Docket Nos. 11-0279 and 11-0282 (cons.), Ameren Illinois Company’s Proposed General Increase in Electric and Natural Gas Rates. As previously noticed, Oral Argument is scheduled for Thursday, January 5, 2012 at 1:00 P.M. in Springfield. Consistent with Section 200.850(b) of the Rules of Practice, Oral Argument will be limited to parties having filed briefs in this docket.
    In addition to the requirements contained in Section 200.850(c) of the Rules of Practice, the Commission herein sets the following additional guidelines: (1) The scope of Oral Argument is as follows:
    a. Return on Equity; b. The Adjustments to Ameren’s Electric Distribution O&M Expense; c. The Adjustments to Ameren’s Rate Case Expense;
    d. The Adjustments to Ameren’s Charitable Contributions; e. Ameren’s Motion to Sever/Dismiss the Electric Proceeding. (2) Oral argument will be structured as noticed in the attached schedule. (3) In addition to the issues listed above, the parties should be prepared to answer any question regarding the record or the pertinent law. (4) Parties intending to present Oral Argument must notify Brian Granahan(bgranahan@icc.illinois.gov) and ALJs Albers (jalbers@icc.illinois.gov) and Yoder (syoder@icc.illinois.gov) with a list of attorneys presenting on the matters for Oral Argument by 1:00 P.M. on Tuesday, January 3, 2012.
    (5) Any parties presenting arguments shall provide Mr. Granahan and ALJs Albers and Yoder with any exhibits to be used for Oral Argument by 1:00 P.M. on Tuesday, January 3, 2012. (6) If an attorney is in need of an accommodation for any visual aid, counsel must inform Mr. Granahan and ALJs Albers and Yoder by 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 3, 2012, as to the specifics of the accommodation needed. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 12/21/2011
    Service - Notice

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the Oral Argument in the above matter is scheduled for January 5, 2012, at the offices of the Commission, Springfield, Illinois, 527 E. Capitol Avenue, at the hour of 1:00 P.M.
    Notice is also given by the Administrative Law Judges that the list of issues to be the subject of Oral Argument will be forthcoming. Parties advised electronically.
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of Kroger Co. filed by Boehm Kurtz & Lowry. (electronic)

  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of the Commercial Group filed by Jenkins at Law, LLC. (electronic)

  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (electronic)
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of The Grain and Feed Association of Illinois filed by Hasselberg Williams Grebe Snodgrass & Birdsall. (electronic)
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenters Lipps & Leland, LLP. (Electronic)
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions on behalf of the Retail Gas Suppliers, filed by DLA Piper LLP (US). (Electronic)
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Joinder and Adoption of The Reply Brief on Exception of the Retail Gas Suppliers by The Illinois Competitive Energy Association, filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (Electronic)
  • 12/15/2011
    Briefs - Reply to Exceptions

    Reply Brief on Exceptions of the People of the State of Illinois and the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 12/14/2011
    Service - Commission Action

    Notice of Commission Action served electronically to parties advising of the action of the Commission on December 13, 2011. You will be notified later as to date, time and place of the Oral Argument.
  • 12/13/2011
    Commission Action - General

    The Commission in conference on December 13, 2011 GRANTED the Request for Oral Argument filed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois on December 8, 2011.
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of The Kroger Co., filed by Boehm Kurtz & Lowry. (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of IBEW, filed by Schuchat Cook & Werner. (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions on behalf of the Retail Gas Suppliers, filed by DLA Piper LLP (US). (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Initial Brief on Exceptions of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Filing - Request

    Request for Oral Argument, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 12/08/2011
    Briefs - On Exceptions

    Brief on Exceptions of The People of the State of Illinois, The Citizens Utility Board and AARP, filed. (electronic)

  • 12/02/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response of the ICEA to Motion for Extension of Time to File Briefs on Exceptions, filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (electronically)

  • 12/02/2011
    Filing - Response

    Ameren Illinois Company's Response to Administrative Law Judge's Post Record Data Request, filed. (electronic)
  • 11/30/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the Motion for Extension of Time to File Briefs on Exceptions, filed November 23, 2011 by the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers and the People of the State of Illinois, is hereby granted in part. The Administrative Law Judges find however, that the amended schedule suggested in the Motion does not allow sufficient time for the preparation of a Post-Exceptions Proposed Order and Commission consideration of the many contested issues in this proceeding. The date for filing of any Brief on Exceptions is therefore deferred to December 8, 2011, and the date for filing Reply Briefs on Exceptions is deferred to December 15, 2011. Parties advised electronically.
  • 11/23/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion for Extension of Time to File Briefs on Exceptions, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen on behalf of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers and the People of the State of Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 11/23/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Noticegiven by the Administrative Law Judges that any responses to the November 23, 2011 “Motion for Extension of Time to File Briefs on Exceptions” must be received by November 28, 2011. Any replies thereto must be received by November 29, 2011. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 11/21/2011
    Filing - Reply

    Reply of AARP in Support of the Response of the State of Illinois and the Citizen Utility Board’s Opposition to Ameren’s Motion to Withdraw, filed by John B. Coffman, LLC. (Electronic)
  • 11/21/2011
    Filing - Reply

    Reply of Ameren Illinois Company to Responses to Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No 11-0279, filed. (Electronic)
  • 11/21/2011
    Filing - Reply

    IIEC Reply to Response to Ameren Motion to Withdraw and Terminate Docket 11-0279, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 11/17/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response of the Commercial Group Opposing AIC’s Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No. 11-0279, filed by Jenkins at Law, LLC. (Electronic)
  • 11/17/2011
    Filing - Response

    IBEW's Response to AIC Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No. 11-0279, filed by Schuchat Cook & Werner. (Electronic)
  • 11/17/2011
    Filing - Response

    IIEC Response to Ameren Motion to Withdraw Tariffs, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 11/17/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response of the People of the State of Illinois and the Citizens Utility board to Ameren’s Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No. 11-0279, filed. (Electronic)
  • 11/15/2011
    Service - Proposed Order

    Proposed Order served electronically to parties.
  • 11/15/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that Briefs on Exceptions and Briefs in Reply to Exceptions shall follow the outline of the Proposed Order. Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges of the attached Post Record Data Request. Notice further given that Commission Staff’s October 25, 2011 “Motion to Strike” is granted. Notice further given that Conoco Phillips Company’s November 7, 2011 Petition to Intervene as an Illinois Industrial Energy Consumer is granted.
    Notice further given that in the event the Commission grants Ameren Illinois Company’s (“AIC”) November 10, 2011 “Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No. 11-0279” prior to the deadline for the submission of Briefs on Exceptions, AIC is directed to indicate in its Brief on Exceptions exactly which portions of the Proposed Order should be eliminated. To the extent that any expenses (and adjustments thereto) in the Proposed Order are allocated to both electric and gas customers, AIC is directed to specify and explain how it proposes to allocate such expenses (and adjustments thereto) if Docket No. 11-0279 is dismissed. Any party that wishes may reply in its Brief in Reply to Exceptions to AIC’s response in this regard. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 11/10/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No. 11-0279, filed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 11/10/2011
    Service - Notice

    Notice given that the Administrative Law Judges’ Ruling previously served carried incorrect information. It should have stated the following:
    Notice is hereby given by the Administrative Law Judges that any responses to the “Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No. 11-0279”, filed November 10, 2011 by Ameren Illinois Company, are to be filed by Thursday, November 17, 2011. Any replies to responses are to be filed by Monday, November 21, 2011. Parties advised electronically.
  • 11/10/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that any responses to the “Motion to Withdraw Electric Tariff Sheets and Sever and Terminate Docket No. 11-0279”, filed November 10, 2011 by Ameren Illinois Company, are to be filed by Thursday, November 18, 2011. Any replies to responses are to be filed by Monday, November 21, 2011. Parties advised electronically.
  • 11/07/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene for ConocoPhillips Company as part of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 10/26/2011
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Draft Proposed Order of the Kroger Co., filed by Boehm Kurtz & Lowry. (Electronic)
  • 10/26/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company's Motion for Leave to File Revised Reply Brief Instanter, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 10/26/2011
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Draft Proposed Order on behalf of the Retail Gas Suppliers, filed by DLA Piper LLP (US). (Electronic)
  • 10/26/2011
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Joinder and Adoption of the Draft Proposed Order of the Retail Gas Suppliers by the Illinois Competitive Energy Association, filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (Electronic)
  • 10/26/2011
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Summary of Positions of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 10/26/2011
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Draft Order of the People of the State of Illinois, the Citizens Utility Board and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/26/2011
    Filing - Draft/Suggested Order

    Draft/Proposed Order of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lips & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Kroger Co., filed by Boehm Kurtz & Lowry. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief (Revised) of the Illinois Competitive Energy Association, filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Strike, filed by Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Retail Gas Suppliers, filed by DLA Piper LLP (US). (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Joinder and Adoption of the Reply Brief of the Retail Gas Suppliers by the Illinois Competitive Energy Association, filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Commercial Group, filed by Jenkins at Law, LLC. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Grain and Feed Association of Illinois, filed by Hasselberg Williams Grebe Snodgrass & Birdsall. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland, LLP. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 10/25/2011
    Briefs - Reply/Response

    Reply Brief of the People of the State of Illinois, the Citizens Utility Board and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/24/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges' that the Citizens Utility Board's October 13, 2011 "Motion to Strike" is hereby granted. The Illinois Competitive Assocation is directed to resubmit is Initial Brief in accordance with this ruling no later than October 28, 2011. Parties advised electronically.
  • 10/20/2011
    Filing - Reply

    Reply of the Citizens Utility Board in Support of its Motion to Strike, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/18/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response of the Illinois Competitive Energy Association to the Citizens Utility Board's Motion to Strike, filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (Electronic)
  • 10/18/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response of the People of the State of Illinois to the Citizens Utility Board's Motion to Strike, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/18/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the corrections to the transcript suggested by Ameren Illinois Company on September 30, 2011 and by Commission Staff on October 7, 2011 shall be made as proposed. Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges that Commission Staff’s October 14, 2011 “Motion for Leave to File Revised Initial Brief Instanter” is granted. Parties advised electronically.
  • 10/14/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission's Motion for Leave to File Revised Initial Brief Instanter, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/14/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that any response to the Citizens Utility Board’s October 13, 2011 motion to strike concerning the Initial Brief of the Illinois Competitive Energy Association must be received by October 18, 2011. Any replies thereto must be received by October 20, 2011. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 10/13/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Strike of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief filed by Boehm Kurtz & Lowry on behalf of the Kroger Company. (electronic)

  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief filed by Jenkins at Law, LLC on behalf of the Commercial Group. (electronic)

  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company. (electronic)

  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief filed by Hasselberg Williams Grebe Snodgrass & Birdsall on behalf of The Grain and Feed Association of Illinois. (electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Post-Hearing Brief filed by Schuchat Cook & Werner on behalf of IBEW. (electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of The Illinois Competitive Energy Association filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (electronic)

  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief on behalf of the Retail Gas Suppliers, filed by DLA Piper LLP (US). (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of the Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of the People of the State of Illinois, the Citizens Utility Board and AARP, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Briefs - Initial

    Initial Brief of the Citizens Utility Board, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/11/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that pursuant to 83 Ill. Adm. Code 200.580, any objections to Commission Staff’s October 7, 2011 “Motion to Correct the Transcript” must be received by October 17, 2011. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 10/07/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Correct the Transcript, filed by Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission. (Electronic)
  • 10/05/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the public version of Ameren Exhibit 54.0, as filed on September 27, 2011 on e-Docket, and the public version of Attachment A associated therewith, as filed on October 4, 2011 on e-Docket, are admitted into the record. Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges that the record reflects two different exhibits identified as “IIEC Cross Ex. 5.” The first was offered on September 15, 2011 and consists of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers’ data request to Timothy Eggers numbered 7.22. The second was offered on September 16, 2011 and consists of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers’ data requests to Greg Rockrohr numbered 3.01 through and including 3.05. The Administrative Law Judges hereby rule that the latter cross exhibit offered on September 16, 2011 shall be relabeled “IIEC Cross Ex. 6.” Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 10/04/2011
    Filing - Response

    Ameren Illinois Company's Response (by Letter) to the Administrative Law Judge's Notice Dated October 3, 2011, filed. (Electronic)
  • 10/03/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the confidential version of Ameren Exhibit 54.0, as filed on September 27, 2011 on e-Docket, is admitted into the record. With regard to the public version of Ameren Exhibit 54.0, however, Ameren Illinois Company (“AIC”) is directed to refile by October 7, 2011 its response to the September 14, 2011 Administrative Law Judge Data Request with a properly redacted public version of Attachment A. Only the numerical values need be redacted from Attachment A as the remaining information already exists in the public record. Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges that pursuant to 83 Ill. Adm. Code 200.580, any objections to AIC’s September 30, 2011 suggested corrections to the transcripts must be received by October 11, 2011. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 09/30/2011
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 16, 2011, received.
  • 09/30/2011
    Filing - Notice

    Ameren Illinois Company's Suggested Corrections to the September 12-15, 2011 Hearing Transcripts, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 09/29/2011
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 15, 2011, received.
  • 09/28/2011
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 14, 2011, received.

  • 09/28/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Noticegiven by the Administrative Law Judges that the attached outline shall be used by all parties submitting an Initial Brief and/or Reply Brief. Those parties not addressing a particular issue shall not renumber the outline. Such parties shall simply leave blank those issues they are not addressing. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 09/27/2011
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 12, 2011, received.
  • 09/27/2011
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 13, 2011, received.
  • 09/27/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response (by Letter) to Administrative Law Judge Data Request Dated September 14, 2011, filed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (Electronic)
  • 09/21/2011
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - September 7, 2011, received.
  • 09/19/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the September 16, 2011 “Motion in Limine” filed by Commission Staff is granted. Notice also given that the Retail Gas Suppliers’ September 16, 2011 oral motion to strike certain previously admitted testimony (if the above referenced “Motion in Limine” is granted) is denied.
    Notice further given that based on the Administrative Law Judges’ understanding that the Retail Gas Suppliers would have no cross-examination for Mr. Torsten Clausen if the above referenced “Motion in Limine” is granted, the hearing scheduled for September 20, 2011, is cancelled and has been continued generally.
    Notice further given that Staff Exhibits 16.0, 32.0, and 32.1 are admitted into the record. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 09/16/2011
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued to September 20, 2011, in Springfield, at 1:30 P.M.
  • 09/16/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: Staff Exh. 7.0-Direct Testimony of Rochelle Phipps-filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 7.01-7.05
    Staff Exh. 24.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Rochelle Phipps-filed 8/23/11 with Sch. 24.1-24.03 and Att. 1-3

    AG/CUB Exh. 3.0-Direct Testimony of Christopher Thomas-filed 6/29/11 with Att. 3.1
    AG/CUB Exh. 6.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Christopher Thomas-filed 8/23/11

    AG/CUB Exh. 2.0-Direct Testimony of Scott Rubin-filed 6/29/11 with Att. 2.1-2.4
    AG/CUB Exh. 5.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Scott Rubin-filed 8/23/11 with Att. 5.1 and 5.2
    AG/CUB Exh. 5.3-Affidavit of Scott Rubin-filed 9/19/11

    IIEC Exh. 1.0-Direct Testimony of Robert Stephens-filed 6/29/11 with Exh. 1.1-1.5
    IIEC Exh. 5.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Robert Stephens-filed 8/23/11 with Exh. 5.1-5.3

    Staff Exh. 1.0-Direct Testimony of Scott Struck-filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 1.01 AIC-E and AIC-G, ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ3; Sch. 1.02 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 1.03 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 1.04 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 1.05 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 1.06 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 1.07 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3;
    Staff Exh. 19.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Scott Struck-filed 8/23/11 with Sch. 19.01 AIC-E to AIC-G, ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 19.02 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch, 19.03 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; 19.04 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 19.05 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 19.06 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3; Sch. 19.07 ERZ-1 to ERZ-3, GRZ-1 to GRZ-3
    Staff Exh. 19.1-affidavit of S. Struck-filed 9/16/11
  • 09/16/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    Ameren Cross-Exh. 11-copies of correspondence by Ameren to Clerk regarding accounting for IP merger-not moved into evidence
    Ameren Cross-Exh. 12-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 5.04-admitted
    AIC Cross-Exh. 13-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 7.63-admitted
    AIC Cross Exh.. 14-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 17.06-admitted
    AIC Cross-Exh. 15-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 17.23-admitted
    AIC Cross-Exh. 16-Moody's Investor Service Report on CILCO-1/30/09-admitted
    AIC Cross-Exh. 17-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 17.03-admitted

    IIEC Cross-Exh. 6-Responses to Data Requests IIEC-Staff 3.01-3.05-indicated on the record as IIEC Cross-exh. 5-corrected by ALJ ruling on 10-5-11

    RGS Cross-Exh. 9-Response to Data Request RGS 3.01
    RGS Cross-Exh. 10-Response to Data Request RGS 4.01
    RGS Cross-Exh. 11-Responses to Data Requests RGS 1.01, including 1st and 2nd supplemental responses, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04, 1.05, 1.07, 1.14 including 1st and 2nd supplemental, 1.18 including supplemental response, 1.19 including 1st and 2nd supplemental, 1.20 including supplemental response, 1.21 including supplemental response, 1.28, 1.29 including supplemental response, 1.30, 1.32, 2.03, 2.07 and 2.08
    RGS Cross Exh. 12- confidential-Response to Data Request RGS 1.25 including 1st, 2nd and 3rd supplemental response (RGS to filed public version)
  • 09/16/2011
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/16/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion in Limine, filed by Staff of the Illinois Commerce Commission. (Electronic)
  • 09/15/2011
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued to September 16, 2011, in Springfield, at 9:00 A.M.
  • 09/15/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: IIEC Exh. 3.0 Corrected-Corrected Direct Testimony of Michael Gorman-filed 7/12/11 with Exh. 3.1 Corrected, 3.4 Corrected, 3.7-3.9 Corrected and 3.13 Corrected
    IIEC Exh. 3.2, 3.3, 3.5, 3.6, 3.10-3.12-filed 6/29/11
    IIEC Exh. 4.0-Direct Testimony of Michael Gorman-filed 6/29/11 with Exh. 4.1-4.2
    IIEC Exh. 7.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Michael Gorman-filed 8/23/11
    IIEC Exh. 8.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Michael Gorman-filed 8/23/11 with Exh. 8.1
    IIEC Exh. 9.0-Affidavit of Michael Gorman-filed 9/13/11
    IIEC Exh. 10.0-Affidavit of Michael Gorman-filed 9/13/11

    IIEC Exh. 2.0-Direct Testimony of David Stowe-filed 6/29/11 with Exh. 2.1-2.9
    IIEC Exh. 6.0-Rebuttal Testimony of David Stowe-filed 8/23/11 with Exh. 6.1-6.3

    Ameren Exh. 14.0E Revised-Revised Direct Testimony of Ryan Schonhoff-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 14.1E-14.2E-filed 2/18/11
    Ameren Exh. 32.0 Revised-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Ryan Schonhoff-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 32.1-32.5-filed 7/26/11
    Ameren Exh. 49.0 Revised-Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Ryan Schonhoff-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 49.1-49.4-filed 9/1/11

    Ameren Exh. 13.0E Revised-2nd Revised Direct Testimony of Leonard Jones-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 13.1E-13.6E-filed 2/18/11
    Ameren Exh. 13.7E Revised-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 31.0 Revised-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Leonard Jones-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 31.1-31.4-filed 7/26/11
    Ameren Exh. 48.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Leonard Jones-filed 9/1/11 with Exh. 48.1-48.2

    Ameren Exh. 37.0 Revised-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of James Warren-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 37.1-Affidavit of James Warren-filed 9/15/11

    Staff Exh. 14.0-Direct Testimony of Peter Lazare-filed 6/29/11 with Att. A-B, Sch. 14.01-14.23
    Staff Exh. 30.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Peter Lazare-filed 8/23/11
  • 09/15/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    IIEC Cross-Exh. 2-Response to Data Request IIEC 14.06-admitted
    IIEC Cross-Exh. 3-Responses to Data Requests IIEC 5.01, 5.03, 14.06, 14.07, 16.02, 16.03, 16.06-admitted
    IIEC Cross-Exh. 4-Responses to Data Requests IIEC-Staff 2.01-2.06, 2.08, 2.012, 2.013 and 2.015-admitted
    IIEC Cross-Exh. 5-Responses to Data Requests 7.22
  • 09/15/2011
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/14/2011
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued to September 15, 2011, in Springfield, at 9:00 A.M.
  • 09/14/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: Ameren Exh. 3.0E and 3.0G-Direct Testimony of Robert Hevert-filed 2/18/11 with Exh. 3.1E-3.12E, and 3.1G-3.14G
    Ameren Exh. 3.0G Revised Appendix A-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 23.0R-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Robert Hevert-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 23.1-23.21-filed 7/26/11
    Ameren Exh. 41.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Robert Hevert-filed 9/1/11 with Exh. 41.1-41.11

    Ameren Exh. 14.0G Revised-Revised Direct Testimony of Timothy Eggers-filed 6/20/11
    Ameren Exh. 14.1G-14.7G-filed 2/18/11
    Ameren Exh. 34.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Timothy Eggers-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 34.1-34.7
    Ameren Exh. 51.0 Revised-Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Timothy Eggers-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 51.1-filed 9/1/11

    Ameren Exh. 15.0G-Direct Testimony of Vonda Seckler-confidential and proprietary-filed 2/18/11 with Exh. 15.1G confidential and proprietary; Exh. 15.2G-15.3G, 15.5G;
    Ameren Exh. 15.4G 2nd Revised-filed 6/20/11
    Ameren Exh. 35.0 Revised-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Vonda Seckler-filed 9/12/11
    Ameren Exh. 35.1-both confidential and proprietary, Exh. 35.2-filed 7/26/11
    Ameren Exh. 52.0 Revised-Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Vonda Seckler-filed 9/9/11

    Ameren Exh. 7.0E and 7.0G-Direct Testimony of Krista Bauer-filed 2/18/11 with Exh. 7.1 confidential and proprietary
    Ameren Exh. 7.2R-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 7.3R-filed 6/1/11
    Ameren Exh. 20.0-Revised Direct Testimony of Krista Bauer-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 27.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Krista Bauer-filed 7/26/11
    Ameren Exh. 45.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Krista Bauer-filed 9/1/11
    Ameren Exh. 45.1-affidavit-filed 9/14/11

    Ameren Exh. 13.0G-REvised Direct Testimony of Karen Althoff-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 13.01G-13.8G, 13.10G-13.12G-filed 2/18/11
    Ameren Exh. 13.9G Revised-filed 6/20/11
    Ameren Exh. 19.0-Supplemental Direct Testimony of Karen Althoff-filed 5/27/11 with Exh. 19.1
    Ameren Exh. 33.0-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Karen Althoff-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 33.1-33.11-filed 7/26/11
    Ameren Exh. 50.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Karen Althoff-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 50.1-affidavit -filed 9/15/11

    Ameren Exh. 5.0E and 5.0G-Direct Testimony of David Heintz-filed 2/18/11 with Exh. 5.1-5.18
    Ameen Exh. 25.0-Rebuttal Testimony of David Heintz-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 25.1
    Ameren Exh. 43.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of David Heintz-filed 9/1/11
    Ameren Exh. 43.1-affidavit-filed 9/14/11

    Ameren Exh. 8.0E and 8.0G-Direct Testimony of Randall Lynn-filed 2/18/11 with Exh. 8.1
    Ameren Exh. 8.2 -affidavit-filed 9/14/11

    Ameren Exh. 12.0E and 12.0G-Direct Testimony of James Mazurek-filed 2/18/11 with Exh. 12.1
    Amernen Exh. 30.0-Rebuttal Testimony of James Mazurek-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 30.1-30.5
    Ameren Exh. 47.0-Surebuttal Testimony of James Mazurek-filed 9/1/11
    Ameren Exh. 47.1-affidavit-filed 9/14/11

    Ameren Exh. 10.0E Revised and 10.0G Revised-Revised Direct Testimony of Brenda Menke-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 17.0-Supplemental Direct Testimony of Brenda Menke-filed 5/27/11
    Ameren Exh. 17.1-affidavit- filed 9/14/11

    Ameren Exh. 28.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Stan Ogden-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 28.1
    Ameren Exh. 53.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Stan Ogden-filed 9/1/11
    Ameren Exh. 53.1-affidavit-filed 9/14/11

    Ameren Exh. 36.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Gary Rygh-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 36.1
    Ameren Exh. 36.2-affidavit-filed 9/14/11

    Ameren Exh. 9.0E and 9.0G-Direct Testimony of Michael Getz-filed 2/18/11 with Exh. 9.1-9.2
    Ameren Exh. 18.0-Supplemental Direct Testimony of Michael Getz-filed 5/27/11 with Exh. 18.1
    Ameren Exh. 29.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Michael Getz-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 29.1-29.6
    Ameren Exh. 46.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Michael Getz-filed 9/1/11 with Exh. 46.1-46.5
    Ameren Exh. 46.6-affidavit-filed 9/14/11

    Staff Exh. 8.0-Direct Testimony of Janis Freetly-filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 8.01E, 8.01G, 8.02, 8.03E, 8.03G, 8.04E, 8.04G, 8.05E, 8.05G, 8.06E, 8.06G, 8.07-8.09
    Staff Exh. 25.0R-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Janis Freetly-filed 8/29/11

    Staff Exh. 13.0-Direct Testimony of David Sackett-filed 6/29/11 with Att. A
    Staff Exh. 29.0-Rebuttal Testimony of David Sackett-filed 8/23/11 with Att. A

    Staff Exh. 34.0-Rebuttal Testimony of David Reardon-filed 8/23/11

    AG/CUB Exh. 1.0 -confidential and public versions, direct testimony of David Effron filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 1.1
    AG/CUB Exh. 4.0 -rebuttal testimony of David Effron filed 8/23/11 with Sch. 4.1
    AG/CUB Exh. 4.2 -affidavit of David Effron filed 9/12/11

    Staff Cross-Exh. 11-Workpaper: Uncollectible Event Study - MichCon Financial Data, Workpaper: Uncollectible Event Study - DTE Financial Data, Workpaper: Detroit Edison and MichCon financial data (5 pages); and Response to Staff Data Request JF 7.03 with attachments-filed 9/19/11
    Staff Cross-Exh. 12-Responses to Staff Data Requests DAS 1.29, 2.01, 5.01, 5.04, 5.05, 5.07-5.15-filed 9/19/11
    Staff Cross- Exh. 13- Responses to Data Requests DLH 2.12, 2.12S -filed 9/19/11
  • 09/14/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    AIC Cross-Exh. 9-Responses to Data Requests AIC-Staff 7.08, 7.09, 7.10, 7.13, 7.17, 7.19, 7.21, 7.23
    AIC Cross-Exh. 10-Responses to Data Requests AIC-AG/CUB 1.01, 1.06, ,1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 1.12-1.17, 1.20
    RGS Cross-Exh. 2-Responses to Data Requests IGS 2.01 --admitted
    RGS Cross-Exh. 3-Response to Data Reqeust RGS 5.01-admitted
    RGS Cross-Exh. 4-copy of Section 19-130 of PUA -not offered
    RGS Cross-Exh. 5-Response to Data Request RGS 5.05 -admitted
    RGS Cross-Exh. 6-excerpt from 2/5/08 Order in Docket Nos. 07-0241/07-0242 -not offered
    RGS Cross-Exh. 7-2007 ICC Annual Report on Development of Natural Gas Markets in Illinois -not offered
    RGS Cross Exh. 8-Response to Data Request RGS 1.08 -admitted
  • 09/14/2011
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/14/2011
    Transcript - Received

    PUBLIC FORUM Transcript - August 30, 2011, received.
  • 09/14/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois (“AIC”) shall file with the Chief Clerk of the Commission as a late-filed exhibit the information described below no later than September 26, 2011. A. Technical Experts employed by AIC or its affiliates - State in dollars the amount of compensation expended to, or expected to be expended to, each technical expert for work related to prepare and litigate the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases.
    If such value is not available, state the total annual compensation of each technical expert who performed or is expected to perform work related to preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases as well as the percentage of each technical expert's annual work hours that were or will be expended performing work related to preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases. Also identify the issues addressed by each technical expert. B. Attorneys employed by AIC or its affiliates - Identify by name each attorney on whom AIC has expended or expects to expend money for the preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases. State in dollars the amount of compensation expended to, or expected to be expended to, each attorney for work related to prepare and litigate the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases. If such value is not available, state the total amount billed or expected be billed to AIC for each attorney who has performed work or will perform work related to the currently pending electric and gas delivery services rate cases. Also state the percentage of each attorney's billable hours that were or are expected to be expended performing work related to preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases. If an attorney's time was primarily spent on any specific issue(s), identify the issue(s). Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 09/14/2011
    Service - Notice

    Notice given that the Notice of Administrative Law Judges’ Ruling served today had the following language omitted. It should have stated:
    Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois (“AIC”) shall file with the Chief Clerk of the Commission as a late-filed exhibit the information described below no later than September 26, 2011. A. Technical Experts employed by AIC or its affiliates -
    Identify by name each technical expert on whom AIC expended or expects to expend money for the preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases.
    State in dollars the amount of compensation expended to, or expected to be expended to, each technical expert for work related to prepare and litigate the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases.
    If such value is not available, state the total annual compensation of each technical expert who performed or is expected to perform work related to preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases as well as the percentage of each technical expert's annual work hours that were or will be expended performing work related to preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases. Also identify the issues addressed by each technical expert. B. Attorneys employed by AIC or its affiliates - Identify by name each attorney on whom AIC has expended or expects to expend money for the preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases. State in dollars the amount of compensation expended to, or expected to be expended to, each attorney for work related to prepare and litigate the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases.
    If such value is not available, state the total amount billed or expected be billed to AIC for each attorney who has performed work or will perform work related to the currently pending electric and gas delivery services rate cases. Also state the percentage of each attorney's billable hours that were or are expected to be expended performing work related to preparation and litigation of the currently pending electric and gas delivery service cases. If an attorney's time was primarily spent on any specific issue(s), identify the issue(s). Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 09/13/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Errata to the Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Staff Witness of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/13/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response of the Citizens Utility Board to the Retail Gas Suppliers’ Motion to Compel Responses to Retail Gas Suppliers’ First Set of Data Requests, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/13/2011
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued to September 14, 2011, in Springfield at 9:00 A.M.
  • 09/13/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: AIC Exh. 4.0E and 4.0G Revised-Revised Direct Testimony of Ryan Martin-filed 9/13/11
    AIC Exh. 4.1-4.4-filed 2/18/11
    AIC Exh. 24.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Ryan Martin-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 24.1-24.6
    AIC Exh. 42.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Ryan Martin-filed 9/1/11

    AIC Exh. 2.0E and 2.0G-Revised Direct Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 5/27/11
    AIC Exh. 2.1-2.2, 2.4-2.5-filed 2/18/11
    AIC Exh. 2.3 Corrected-filed 5/27/11
    AIC Exh. 16.0-Supplemental Direct Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 5/27/11 with Exh. 16.1-16.4
    AIC Exh. 22.0-Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 9/9/11
    AIC Exh. 22.1-22.6, 22.8-22.19-filed 7/26/11
    AIC Exh. 22.7 Revised-filed 9/9/11
    AIC Exh. 38.0-Supplemental Rebuttal Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 8/17/11
    AIC Exh. 40.0-Revised Surrebuttal Testimony of Ronald Stafford-filed 9/9/11
    AIC Exh. 40.1-40.12-filed 9/1/11
    AIC Exh. 40.13-filed 9/1/11 confidential and proprietary

    RGS Exh. 1.0C-Corrected Direct Testimony of James Crist-filed 9/13/11
    RGS Exh. 2.0C-Corrected Rebuttal Testimony of James Crist-filed 9/13/11 with Exh. 2.1-2.3

    Staff Exh. 4.0-Direct Testimony of Scott Tolsdorf-filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 4.01-4.11, Sch. 4.12 ERZ 1-3, GRZ 1-3; Sch. 4.13 and Att. A
    Staff Exh. 22.0 R2-Second Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Scott Tolsdorf-filed 9/13/11 with Sch. 22.01R ERZ 1-3 GRZ 1-3; Sch. 22.02-22.04; Sch. 22.05R2 ERZ 1-3, GRZ 1-3; Sch. 22.06; Att. A; Att. B

    Staff Exh. 2.0R-Revised Direct Testimony of Dianna Hathhorn-filed 8/25/11
    with Sch. 2.01-2.11 and Att. A-B
    Staff Exh. 20.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Dianna Hathhorn-filed 8/23/11 with 20.01-20.04 and Att. A and B

    Staff Exh. 15.0-Direct Testimony of Phillip Rukosuev-filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 15.01-15.13
    Staff Exh. 31.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Phillip Rukosuev-filed 8/23/11
    Staff Exh. 31.1-Affidavit of P. Rukosuev -filed 9/16/11

    Staff Exh. 18-Direct testimony of David Brightwell filed 6/29/11
    Staff Exh. 33.0R-Revised Rebuttal of David Brightwell-filed 8/29/11
    Staff Exh. 33.1-Affidavit of David Brightwell-filed 9/16/11

    Staff Exh. 5.0-Direct Testimony of Mary Everson-filed 6/29/11
    Staff Exh. 5.1-Affidavit of Mary Everson-filed 9/16/11

    Staff Exh. 6.0-Direct Testimony of Burma Jones-filed 6/29/11 with Att. A and Sch. 6.01
    Staff Exh. 23.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Burma Jones-filed 8/23/11
    Staff Exh. 23.1-Affidavit of Burma Jones-filed 9/16/11

    Staff Exh. 17.0-Direct Testimony of Eric Lounsberry-filed 6/29/11
    Staff Exh. 17.1-Affidavit of Eric Lounsberry-filed 9/16/11

    Staff Exh. 9.0-Direct Testimony of Mark Maple-filed 6/29/11 with Exh. 9.01-9.04 both confidential and proprietary
    Staff Exh. 26.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Mark Maple-filed 8/23/11 both confidential and proprietary
    Staff Exh. 26.1-Affidavit of Mark Maple-filed 9/16/11

    Staff Exh. 10.0-Direct Testimony of Greg Rockrohr-filed 6/29/11 with Att. A-F
    Staff Exh. 10.1-Affidavit of Greg Rockrohr-filed 9/16/11

    Staff Exh. 11.0R-Revised Direct Testimony of Mona Elsaid-as adopted by Roy Buxton-filed 8/25/11 with Att. A-C
    Staff Exh. 27.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Mona Elsaid-as adopted by Roy Buxton-filed 8/23/11
    Staff Exh. 35.0-Affidavit of Roy Buxton-filed 9/16/11
  • 09/13/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    Staff Cross-Exh. 1-Responses to Staff Data Requests RMP 9.01, RMP 1.10S and RMP 14.01, all Confidential and Proprietary-admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 2-Portion of 285 filing-WP(D-2)1 Attach. 5-not admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 3- August 1, 2011 Blue Chip Forecast-not admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 4-Survey of Professional Forecasters of May 13, 2011-not admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 5-Response to Staff Data Request RMP 1.23-admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 6-Moody's Investors Service Report-not admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 7-Response to Staff Data Request RMP 1.22-admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 8-Response to Staff Data Request RMP 2.04-admitted

    Staff Cross-Exh. 9-Ameren 4th Quarter Results and 2011 Earnings Guidance-not admitted
    Staff Cross-Exh. 10-Portion of 285 filing from 2007 rate case-not admitted
    AG/CUB Cross-Exh. 6-Response to Data Request AG-DJE 1.16R-admitted

    AIC Cross-Exh. 5-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 7.30-7.48-admitted
    AIC Cross-Exh. 6-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 16.17-16.20-admitted
    AIC Cross-Exh. 7-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 9.01-9.04-admitted

    AIC Cross-Exh. 8-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 22.01-admitted
  • 09/13/2011
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/12/2011
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judges Albers and Yoder and continued to September 13, 2011, in Springfield, at 9:00 A.M.
  • 09/12/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    e-Docket: Ameren Exh. 1.0E- Revised Direct Testimony of Craig Nelson-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 filed 2/18/11
    Ameren Exh. 1.0G- Revised Direct Testimony of Craig Nelson-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 21.0- Second Revised Rebuttal Testimony of Craig Nelson-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 21.1-21.4,21.6-21.10-filed 7/26/11
    Ameren Exh. 21.5 Revised-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 39.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Craig Nelson-filed 9/1/11

    Ameren Exh. 6.0 E, 6.0 G-Second Revised Direct Testimony of Ronald Pate-filed 9/9/11
    Ameren Exh. 6.1-6.4-filed 2/18/11
    Ameren 6.5-filed 2/18/11-confidential and properietary
    Ameren Exh. 6.5 Third Revised-filed 6/1/11-public version
    Ameren Exh. 6.6-filed 2/18/11-confidential and proprietary version
    Ameren Exh. 6.6 Third Revised-filed 6/1/11-public version
    Ameren Exh. 26.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Ronald Pate-filed 7/26/11 with Exh. 26.1
    Ameren Exh. 44.0-Surrebuttal Testimony of Ronald Pate-filed 9/1/11

    Staff Exh. 3.0-Direct Testimony of Bonita Pearce-filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 3.01 ERZ-1 through ERZ 3 and GRZ 1 through GRZ 3; Sch. 3.02 ERZ 1-3, 3.02 GRZ 1-3; Sch. 3.03 ERZ 1-3, GRZ 1-3; Sch. 3.04 ERZ 1-3, GRZ 1-3; Sch. 3.05; Sch. 3.06 ERZ 1-3, GRZ 1-3; Sch. 3.07; and Att. A-C
    Staff Exh. 21.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Bonita Pearce-filed 8/23/11 with Sch. 21.01 ERZ 1-3 and GRZ 1-3; Sch. 21.02 ERZ 1-3 and GRZ 1-3; Sch. 21.03; Sch. 21.04, and Att. A

    Staff Exh. 12.0-Direct Testimony of Yassir Rashid-filed 6/29/11 with Sch. 12.1-12.2 and Att. A-C
    Staff Exh. 28.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Yassir Rashid-filed 8/23/11 with Sch. 28.1 and Att. A-C

    GFAI Exh. 1.0E and 1.0G-Direct of Jeffrey Adkisson-filed 6/29/11 with Exh. 1.01E-1.05E and 1.01G
    GFAI Exh. 2.0E and 2.0G-Rebuttal Testimony of Jeffrey Adkisson-filed 8/23/11 with Exh. 2.01E, 2.01G-2.03G
    GFAI Exh. 3.0-Affidavit of Jeffrey Adkisson-filed 9/11/11

    CG Exh. 1.0-Direct Testimony of Steve Criss-filed 6/29/11 with Exh. 1.1
    CG exh. 2.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Steve Criss-filed 8/23/11 with Exh. 2.1

    Kroger Exh. 1-Direct Testimony of Kevin Higgins-filed 6/29/11 with Exh. 1.1-1.3
    Kroger Exh. 1.4-Affidavit of Kevin Higgins-filed 6/29/11
    Kroger Exh. 2.0-Rebuttal Testimony of Kevin Higgins-filed 8/23/11 with Exh. 2.1
  • 09/12/2011
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    AG/CUB Cross-Exh. 1-Response to Data Request AG-DJE 3.20S
    AG/CUB Cross-Exh. 2-Ameren Supplement to 285.305C
    AG/CUB Cross-Exh. 3-Ameren WPD-7, page 45-not moved into evidence
    AG/CUB Cross-Exh. 4-Response to Date Request AG-DJE 3.20
    RGS Cross-Exh. 1-screen shot of ICC web page on certifed AGS'

    IIEC Cross-Exh. 1-2 pages of Section 263 of NESC Code 2002 Edition
    AG/CUB Cross Exh. 5-Response to Data Request ST 3.09

    CG Exh. 2.2-Affidavit of Steve Criss-filed 9/12/11

    AIC Cross-Exh. 1-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 16.15
    AIC Cross-Exh. 2-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 16.16
    AIC Cross-Exh. 3-Response to Data Request AIC-Staff 7.49

    AIC Cross-Exh. 4-ICC Assessment of AmerenIP Reliability Report
  • 09/12/2011
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/12/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Errata to the Rebuttal Testimony of Staff Witness of the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 09/12/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Seventh Errata to Direct Testimony of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois filed. (electronic)
  • 09/09/2011
    Filing - Appearance

    Additional Appearance filed on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois. (electronic)
  • 09/09/2011
    Filing - Motion

    The Retail Gas Suppliers’ Verified Motion to Compel Citizens Utility Board Responses to the Retail Gas Suppliers’ First Set of Data Requests filed by DLA Piper LLP (US). (electronic)
  • 09/09/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Sixth Errata to the Testimony of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 09/07/2011
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judge Yoder and continued to September 12, 2011, in Springfield, at 10:00 A.M.
  • 09/07/2011
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 09/02/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice that the Administrative Law Judges have granted the August 22, 2011 "Verified Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jody M. Kyler as Co-Counsel for Intervenor, The Kroger Co." Notice also given that the August 29, 2011 "Verified Petition to Intervene of the Illinois Competitive Energy Association" has been granted.
    Notice is further given that the September 1, 2011 "Petition to Intervene of System Council U-05, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO" has been granted. Notice further given of the following requirements and procedures that are in place in preparation for the evidentiary hearing and the remainder of this docket:
    1) All parties are directed to cooperate and submit to the Administrative Law Judges by 12:00 PM September 9, 2011 a joint list of witnesses indicating on which day each witness is expected to testify and the anticipated duration of cross-examination of each witness by each party.
    2) For any witness for whom no party has any questions, parties are reminded to ask the Administrative Law Judges whether they have any questions for such a witness before planning to admit that witness’ testimony via affidavit. 3) When testimony is to be offered in conjunction with an affidavit, if the affidavit is not already part of the witness’ testimony, the affidavit must be marked as an exhibit as well. 4) With regard to any witness that has any non-substantive corrections to their testimony, parties are advised to simply submit an errata rather than file a motion for leave to correct the errors. In the event that corrections are made to testimony prior to the evidentiary hearing, a corrected version of the testimony must either be (a) filed on e-Docket or (b) brought to the evidentiary hearing. 5) On the first day of the evidentiary hearing, each party must provide a list of the exhibits it intends to offer into the record. If an exhibit was filed on e-Docket, the date on which it was filed and an indication of whether it is a corrected, revised, or confidential exhibit must be provided as well. Cross exhibits that a party may offer at the evidentiary hearing need not be included on the list. Each party should be prepared to disseminate copies of its exhibit list to all other parties at the hearing. The exhibit list need not be filed on e-Docket. 6) With regard to any confidential designations, parties shall be prepared to explain/justify any such designations. 7) All parties are directed to cooperate and submit to the Administrative Law Judges by September 27, 2011 a joint proposed outline for use in the briefs. The outline shall reflect issues that have been resolved as well as those that remain contested. If it is not obvious what a particular entry on the outline represents, a note shall be included indicating what is intended. 8) With regard to any witness that has had only a portion of his/her testimony stricken, the remaining testimony shall be resubmitted as a revised document retaining the line numbers associated with the stricken testimony. For each blank area, an appropriate notation shall be made indicating that the space is intentionally left blank following the striking of the offered testimony. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 09/01/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition to Intervene of System Council U-05, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, filed. (electronic)

  • 08/29/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene of the Illinois Competitive Energy Association, filed by Law Office of Eve Moran. (Electronic)
  • 08/29/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Errata to the Rebuttal Testimony of Staff Witnesses to the Illinois Commerce Commission, filed. (Electronic)
  • 08/22/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Verified Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jody M. Kyler as Co-Counsel for Intervenor, The Kroger Co., filed by Boehmn Kurtz & Lowry. (Electronic)
  • 08/17/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Fifth Errata to the Rebuttal Testimony of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 08/15/2011
    Service - Notice

    Noticegiven that a public forum is scheduled for the following location, date and time: Illinois Commerce Commission, 527 E. Capitol Ave., Springfield, Illinois on August 30, 2011, at 1:00 P.M. The forum is for the purpose of receiving public comment concerning the proposed general increase in natural gas rates proposed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. While one or more members of the Commission might attend, a Commission staff member, serving as a public forum officer, will preside.
    Any questions or concerns regarding a public forum may be directed to Robert Bensko, Homeland Security Director, Illinois Commerce Commission, at 217/524-5049. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 08/15/2011
    Service - Notice

    Notice is hereby given that the Notice of Public Forum served earlier carried incomplete information. It should have stated the following: The forums are for the purpose of receiving public comment concerning the proposed general increase in electric delivery service rates and natural gas rates proposed by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. While one or more members of the Commission might attend, a Commission staff member, serving as a public forum officer, will preside. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 08/12/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the August 1, 2011 Petition to Intervene of Marathon Petroleum Company, LP is granted. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 08/09/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that, pursuant to 83 Ill. Adm. Code 200.500(e), Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois (“AIC”) shall file by August 17, 2011 supplemental testimony and exhibits separately identifying the cost of (1) preparing the electric and gas cost of service studies submitted in support of its February 18, 2011 tariff filings leading to the initiation of these dockets and (2) preparing the electric and gas cost of service studies submitted in response to the February 23, 2011 Administrative Law Judge Deficiency Letter. Notice also given by the Administrative Law Judges that any party wishing to respond to AIC’s filing shall do so through its rebuttal testimony due on August 23, 2011. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 08/01/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene of Marathon Petroleum Company, LP as part of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers Group, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 07/26/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the June 29, 2011 Petition to Intervene of Dominion Retail, Inc. and the July 11, 2011 Petition to Intervene of Viscofan USA, Inc. as an Illinois Industrial Energy Consumer are granted. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 07/11/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition to Intervene on behalf of Viscofan USA, Inc., as part of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 07/08/2011
    Service - Order

    Copy of Resuspension Order served electronically to parties.
  • 07/07/2011
    Order Entered - Resuspension

    Resuspension Order entered.
  • 06/29/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene on behalf of Dominion Retail, Inc., filed by DLA Piper LLP (US). (Electronic)
  • 06/21/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that Ameren Illinois' May 27, 2011 Motion for Leave to file Supplemental Direct Testimony is granted. Parties advised electronically.
  • 06/20/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Fourth Errata to the Direct Testimony of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 06/09/2011
    Filing - Response

    Staff's Response to Ameren Illinois Company's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Direct Testimony, filed. (Electronic)
  • 06/03/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that any responses to the Ameren Illinois Company’s May 27, 2011 “Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Direct Testimony” must be received by June 10, 2011. Any replies thereto must be received by June 17, 2011. Notice further given by the Administrative Law Judges that the petitions to intervene filed by the following entities are granted: 1) Air Products and Chemicals Company and Cargill Inc. as members of the IllinoisIndustrial Energy Consumers (“IIEC”) (filed April 27, 2011); 2) GBC Metals, LLC and Washington Mills Hennepin, Inc. as members of the IIEC (filed May 16, 2011); and
    3) Illinois Cement Company as a member of the IIEC (filed May 27, 2011). Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 06/01/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Third Errata to the Direct Testimony and to Supplemental Direct Testimony of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 05/27/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition for Leave to Intervene of Illinois Cement Company, as part of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Luders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 05/27/2011
    Filing - Errata

    Second Errata to the Direct Testimony of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 05/27/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Direct Testimony, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 05/16/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition to Intervene of GBC Metals, LLC and Washington Mills Hennepin Inc. as part of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 05/04/2011
    Filing - Errata

    First Errata of Ameren Illinois Company, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 05/02/2011
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - April 18, 2011, received.
  • 04/27/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition for Leave to Intervene of Air Products, Chemicals Company, Inc. and Cargill, Inc., as part of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed. (Electronic)
  • 04/27/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given by the Administrative Law Judges that the attached “Terms Governing Protection of Confidential Information” and “Case Management Plan” are adopted for use in this proceeding, thereby resolving the Ameren Illinois Company’s April 12, 2011 “Motion for Entry of a Protective Order” and April 15, 2011 “Motion for Case Management Order and Coordinated Schedule.”
    Notice also given that the Administrative Law Judges have granted the April 21, 2011 petition of Enbridge Energy, LLP, Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation, Granite City Works, to intervene as Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers. Notice served electronically to parties.
  • 04/26/2011
    Filing - Reply

    Ameren Illinois Company's Reply to the People of the State of Illinois' Response to Motion for Case Management Order and Coordinated Schedule, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (electronic)
  • 04/25/2011
    Filing - Response

    People of the State of Illinois’ Response to the Ameren Illinois Company’s Motion for Entry of a Protective Order, filed. (electronic)

  • 04/25/2011
    Filing - Response

    People of the State of Illinois’ Response to the Ameren Illinois Company’s Motion for a Case Management Order and Coordinated Schedule, filed. (electronic)

  • 04/21/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene on behalf of Enbridge Energy, LLP, Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc. and United States Steel Corporation, Granite City Works, as one of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 04/21/2011
    Filing - Response

    Ameren Illinois Company's Response to the ALJ's 2nd Deficiency letter, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 04/18/2011
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judge Albers and continued generally.
  • 04/18/2011
    Hearing Report - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Granted the following petitions to intervene:
    3/29/11 - Citizens Utility Board (E&G); 3/29/11 - People of the State of Illinois (E&G); 4/1/11 - Kroger Co. (E); 4/4/11 - Caterpillar, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company as IIEC (E&G); 4/8/11 - Grain & Feed Association of Illinois (E&G); 4/8/11 - AARP (E);
    4/8/11- Interstate Gas Supply of Illinois, Inc. (G); 4/13/11 - Olin Corporation as IIEC (E);
    4/15/11 - The Commercial Group (consisting of Best Buy Co., Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Macy’s, Inc., Sam’s West, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (E&G). Granted the following motions to appear pro hac vice: 3/30/11 Christopher Kennedy on behalf of AIC;
    4/1/11 Kurt Boehm on behalf of Kroger Co.; 4/8/11 John Coffman on behalf of AARP;
    4/15/11 Alan Jenkins on behalf of The Commercial Group.
  • 04/18/2011
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 04/15/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition of the Commercial Group to Intervene as Party, filed by Jenkins at Law, LLC. (Electronic)
  • 04/15/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion for Leave to Appear, filed by Jenkins at Law, LLC on behalf of the Commercial Group. (Electronic)
  • 04/15/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company’s Motion for Case Management Order and Coordinated Schedule, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 04/13/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition for Leave to Intervene on behalf of Olin Corporation as one of the Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, filed by Lueders Robertson & Konzen. (Electronic)
  • 04/12/2011
    Filing - Appearance

    Notice of Appearance of Counsel on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, filed by Jones Day. (Electronic)
  • 04/12/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Ameren Illinois Company's Motion for Entry of a Protective Order, filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP. (Electronic)
  • 04/08/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Petition to Intervene filed by Hasselberg Williams Grebe Snodgrass & Birdsall on behalf of Grain & Feed Association of Illinois. (electronic)
  • 04/08/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene of AARP and Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filed by John Coffman, LLC. (electronic)

  • 04/08/2011
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice given that the Administrative Law Judges have granted Ameren Illinois Company’s March 31, 2011 Motion to Consolidate.
    Set for Prehearing Conference by the Administrative Law Judges on April 18, 2011, in Springfield at 1:30 P.M. Those wishing to participate in the prehearing conference via telephone may do so upon notifying the Administrative Law Judges of their desire to do so prior to the prehearing conference and ensuring that a telephone bridge will be provided. Notice mailed to parties. (Notice also mailed to Clerks of Municipalities served by Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois, Rate Zone I, II and III - gas & electric)
  • 04/04/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition for Leave to Intervene filed by Lueders, Robertson, Konzen on behalf of IIEC. (electronic)

  • 04/04/2011
    Filing - Appearance

    Entry of Appearance on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company, filed. (electronic)
  • 04/01/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    Verified Petition to Intervene filed by Boehm Kurtz & Lowry on behalf of The Kroger Co. (electronic)

  • 04/01/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Verified Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Kurt J. Boehm as Atty for Intervenors, The Kroger Co.,
    filed by Boehm Kurtz & Lowry on behalf of The Kroger Co. (electronic)
  • 03/31/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Consolidate filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (electronic)

  • 03/30/2011
    Filing - Appearance

    Appearance of Counsel filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (electronic)

  • 03/30/2011
    Filing - Motion

    Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
    filed by Carpenter Lipps & Leland LLP on behalf of Ameren Illinois Company d/b/a Ameren Illinois. (electronic)
  • 03/29/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    CUB Verified Petition to Intervene filed. (electronic)
  • 03/29/2011
    Filing - Petition to Intervene

    People of the State of Illinois Verified Petition to Intervene, filed. (electronic)

  • 03/24/2011
    Service - Order

    Copy of Suspension Order served electronically to parties.
  • 03/24/2011
    Filing - Response

    Response (by Letter) of Ameren Illinois Company to List of ALJs' Deficiences dated February 23, 2011, filed. (Electronic)
  • 03/23/2011
    Order Entered - Suspension

    Suspension Order entered.