Illinois Commerce Commission
Illinois Commerce Commission
527 East Capitol Avenue, Springfield, Illinois 62701
Search
Advanced
Main Menu
Consumers
Comment on a Case
File a Complaint
Electric Choice/Plug In Illinois
®
Natural Gas Choice
Lifeline and Link-Up Telephone Assistance Programs
Controlling Your Energy Bill
Consumer Energy Information
Energy
Telephone
Water & Sewer
Household Goods Movers
Railroad Safety
Relocation Towing
Public Utility
Find a Case
Find a Utility
Find a Provider
ICC Forms
ICC Reports
Contact Transportation
Chief Clerk's Office
9-1-1 Program
Cable and Video
Electricity
JULIE/One-Call Enforcement
Natural Gas
Office of Retail Market Development
Pipeline Safety Program
Telecommunications
Water and Sewer
WETSA Program
Transportation
Find a Case
Find a Licensed Household Goods Mover
Find a Railroad Crossing
Find a Motor Carrier/Trucker
ICC Forms
ICC Reports
Contact Transportation
Processing and Information Office
Household Goods Movers
Motor Carriers/Trucking
Railroad Safety
Relocation Towing
Safety Towing
Warehousing
Collateral Recovery
About ICC
Chairman and Commissioners
Offices and Bureaus
Legal Authority and Rules
Event Calendar
News Archive
RSS Feeds
ICC Forms
ICC Reports
Contracts and Solicitations
Employment Opportunities
Sunshine Project
Contact Transportation
Navigation
ICC
Public Utility
Chief Clerk's Office
Case
Public Comments
e-Docket
Menu
Details
Docket Sheet
Staff Assigned
Service List
Schedule
Documents
Public Comments
Entries
January 10, 2012
Ferson Creek Utilities is asking for a 95% increase in rates. While they have not raised rates for some time, a single increase of this magnitude seems very out of line. This is especially true in the current economic times. It would seem that a maximum 50-60% increase would be more logical.
11-0565
·
Al Anderson
November 14, 2011
Ferson Creek Utilities Company requested 95% increase is price gouging. There is no way this company can justify almost a 100% increase in price to it's consumers stating it needs to cover "current operating expenses".
In addition, FCUC is also price gouging by charging a fixed wastewater service charge to each customer regardless of the amount of water used. A single individual must pay the same service fee as a family of six, irregardless of the amount of water discharged into the sewer system. This fee needs to be restructured based on the number of gallons used.
This is another case of taking a monopoly advantage of consumers because the consumer has no choice in the matter.
The increase should be reduced to a reasonable amount, perhaps 60% pro-rated over a 3 year period.
Wastewater Service charge needs to be based on usage -NOT a flat fee.
11-0565
·
Susan M. Miller
November 14, 2011
Our current water/sewer is about $90.00 a month and I think a hike in rates of over 50% is to high.They have made do for about 36 years since 1984 with current rates so now why the sudden hikes? Thanks for your time.
11-0565
·
Roy Christensen
November 9, 2011
I would like to express a big concern regarding Ferson Creek Utilities 95% increase from our present rate. I could understand the need to increase since everything you can think of are increasing, but to increase 95% is not only out of the question but it is insult to our intelligence of the residents. I think their tactic is to put a percentage larger than what they actually is needed to negotiate the rate they WANT.
Their reasoning to cover the operating expenses, but actually profiting.
I ask you to look in to this request and block the request.
11-0565
·
K. M.
November 9, 2011
they are charging to much now do not give them what they want even though they say the water is good we still get yellow water often. They need to improve what they supply befor arking for more
conrad hecker
11-0565
·
conrad
October 31, 2011
What a shame. You haven't asked for an increase since 1984, so now you want to make up for lost time. As a senior living on Social security & a small pension I find it very hard to digest this. thanks you
11-0565
·
gregory Mittman
October 31, 2011
I am responding to the proposed 95% increase in water and sewer charges for the Ferson Creek Utilities Company. While I understand that we have had some necessary capital improvements I believe this steep increase is not necessary. From a personal standpoint it will be a real hardship coming up with that additional expense. I have been unemployed for over 2 years and this is an expense I can not afford but will have no choice but to pay if it is approved. Why were there no increases in smaller amounts over the years? An increase of this size all at one time shows lack of foresight on the utilities part and we should not be penalized for poor business practices. I urge you to take the economy into account and put any increase into line wih the current rate of inflation.
11-0565
·
Jonathan Cooper
October 31, 2011
Good Morning,
No rate increase since 1984. A 95% increase now requested which translates into approximately a $600/year cost increase to me; the customer.
Please consider the following prior to making any decisions;
- why has Ferson Creek Utilities been unable to pass along rising costs in the last 27 years?
- Why is it that the new owners of Ferson Creek Utilities are unable to run their company without almost doubling the cost for us ?
- Assuming due diligence prior to taking ownership, Ferson Creek Utilities should be able to operate on current funding with reasonable rate hikes as time goes by. Almost $600/year is not a reasonable increase by any definition.
I suggest Ferson Creek start by streamlining their own operations instead of simply passing along massive increases to it's customers. Do the hard work and make some cutbacks, just like the rest of us are doing in this economy.
Sincerely,
Steve Butler
11-0565
·
Steve Butler
October 25, 2011
A rate increase of 95% in this economy is ludicrous and way out of line. Why were there not smaller increases since 1984 instead of trying to load a significant increase now when times are already difficult for many people.
11-0565
·
mary ferguson
October 25, 2011
It seems to me that a 95% rate increase is a bit out of line. Especially in this economy when people are struggling to pay their mortgages. Why were not smaller rate increases between 1984 and now. To ask for a 95% rate increase now isn't reasonable.
11-0565
·
mary ferguson
October 25, 2011
I just don"t understand where UTILITY COMPANIES and POLITICIANS think that the average tax payer can just keep digging deeper in their pockets and come up with more money.We only make so much a year.It is understandable that operating expenses go up every year but to ask for a 95% increase? all of of you have the tax payer to ask for more money,whom do we turn to to ask for more money when we need it!!!!! At this point ask all you want,but we the tax payers are running dry and then what are going to do????
11-0565
·
Jesse C Romero
October 25, 2011
I am against the proposal to increase water and sewer rates by 95%. I agree that rate increases are required due to inflationary issues and required maintenance of infrastructure. I would expect such a large increase be phased in over a 3 to 5 year period to lessen the financial burden on all users and still bring the cost into line with other water & sewer services provided in surrounding areas.
11-0565
·
Greg Palagi
October 25, 2011
A 95% increase is outrageous to ask for at this time with our economy. Please reject this proposed increase - a 5-10% increase would be easier to manage. I also agree with the all the other comments that have been made. Thank you.
11-0565
·
Ginger Evans
October 25, 2011
I live in the Windings and received about a month ago a notice to increase rates. I can understand the reason behind it, but what I can't understand is why the 95% increase. I don't mind paying a reasonable increase but I think that 95% is not reasonable. I would like to know the real reason for such a request. What exactly did go up when it comes to expenses? I know that Ferson Creek Utilities changed ownership and is this the real reason behind the 95% increase?
These are hard times for everyone who lives here. The average SOLD price of all homes in the Windings for the year 2011 is $245,607 (according to Great western Properties/Cody Salter) Most homes are assessed above 300,000 and more. Our property values go down and the taxes do go up.
Give us a break PLEASE and make a reasonable rate increase.
11-0565
·
Lorraine Kramer
October 25, 2011
We are customers of Ferson Creek Utilities and strongly protest the proposed 95% rate increase as unreasonable and would result in severe rate shock to its customers. I have read and fully agree with the October 20, 2011 testimony of Michael Brosch, on file for this case. Specific concerns related to unsubstantiated and inflated cost estimates must be replaced by audited historic costs, properly categorized within GAAP standards. Ferson Creek has a right to competitive rates, based on justified and reasonable cost of operations. We ask the ICC to hold Ferson Creek Utilities to these standards, protect its Illinois residents from unsubstantiated charges and reduce future rates accordingly.
11-0565
·
Rick and Nancy Kasper
October 25, 2011
How can we possibly afford a 95% rate increase with this economy? This is completely unfair. A slight increase I understand, but this is ridiculous.
11-0565
·
Cassandra Johnson
October 25, 2011
I am upset at the 95% rate hike that ferson utilities wants to impose and I ask that you consider a much smaller hike like 25-40% at this time . thank you
11-0565
·
susan schubert and alfred schubert
October 25, 2011
I read recently that the above Utilities Company is applying for a rate increase of 95 %.
Under the current economic conditions an increase of this magnitude is ridiculous.
The company maintains that it has had no increases in its rate since 1984. If this is the case why were previous application for an increase not made. If applications were made and, for whatever reasons, were rejected is it appropriate to now apply for this huge increase?
I think not.
11-0565
·
Joe Renwick
October 20, 2011
They are asking for a 95% rate increase, or on the average 48 dollars per month per resident. That is outrageous and no increase even close to that should be allowed. I suggest a maximum increase of 10%.
11-0565
·
Charles Engel
October 20, 2011
While I certainly understand the need for periodic increases in rates, I am having a hard time in understanding why the rates were not increased several times since 1984 instead of 95% all at once. It will be a hardship for many of us on a fixed income.
I also wonder why a one person household pays as much as a 4 or 5 member household.
11-0565
·
Susan Nelson
October 20, 2011
We strongly object to the proposed increase of our yearly water-sewer fee by $580, or slightly less than a 100% increase, in these recessionary times, without any apparent regard to the affect such an increase will have on us retired people living on fixed incomes.
11-0565
·
Greg and Carol Claricoates
October 12, 2011
I feel that the 95% rate increase is too much for the current economy. I wonder if it is common for utility companies to not pass along rate increases until a time that the request would just about double the fees – most businesses cannot operate successfully that way. I currently average about $44 monthly to Ferson Creek Utilities Company for water and sewer, and another $26 monthly to rent an iron filter to get rid of the rust in that water. The rate increase requested will bring my total monthly cost to over $110, which to me seems excessive for water and sewer for one individual.
11-0565
·
Jane Hankison
Entries: 22
Cases
Parameter Search for Cases
Parameter Search for Documents
Login to
e-Docket
Consolidations
This case is consolidated with these cases:
11-0561
11-0562
11-0563
11-0564
11-0566
Search
Consolidations
Notes
If you add a shortcut to your browser, you may revist this report anytime you wish.
To receive any updates to this query, you may
subscribe to the RSS feed
.