Case Number: 05-0788

  • 01/30/2006
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - January 13, 2006, received.
  • 01/30/2006
    Filing - Report

    Report - Verified Statement regarding Interconnection Agreement between The El Paso Telephone Company and Sprint Spectrum L.P. and other Sprint Entities, filed by Meyer Capel, A Professional Corporation. (Electronic)
  • 01/27/2006
    Service - Order

    Copy of Final Order served electronically to parties.
  • 01/25/2006
    Transcript - Received

    Transcript - January 10, 2006, received.
  • 01/25/2006
    Order Entered - Final

    Final Order entered.
  • 01/13/2006
    Hearing Report - Heard and Taken-Yes

    Heard by Administrative Law Judge Sainsot and Taken.
  • 01/13/2006
    Hearing Report - Exhibits

    Petitioner's Exhibit 1: Verified Statement attached to petition. Staff Exhibit 1: Verified Statement of A. Olusanjo Omoniyi. All admitted as filed on e-Docket.
  • 01/13/2006
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 01/10/2006
    Hearing Report - Heard and Continued

    Heard by Administrative Law Judge Sainsot and continued to January 13, 2006, in Chicago, at 10:00 A.M.
  • 01/10/2006
    Transcript - Pending

    Transcript pending.
  • 01/10/2006
    Service - Hearing Continuance Letter

    Hearing continued by the Administrative Law Judge to January 13, 2006, in Chicago at 10:00 A.M. Parties advised electronically.
  • 01/06/2006
    Filing - Petition/Application-Amended

    Amended Joint Petition for Approval of Negotiated Traffic Termination Agreement Between The El Paso Telephone Company and WirelessCo, L.P., and Sprintcom, Inc., filed. (Electronic)
  • 12/16/2005
    Service - Setting/Prehearing Conference

    Set for hearing by the Administrative Law Judge to January 10, 2006, in Chicago, at 1:00 P.M. Parties served electronically.
  • 12/14/2005
    Service - Administrative Law Judge Ruling

    Notice is hereby given that the Administrative Law Judge has completed a preliminary
    review of the Petitions in Docket 05-0788 filed by various Sprint entities and El Paso Telephone
    Cooperative, and directs the parties to show cause why these petitions should not be dismissed for failure to be certificated by this Commission to operate as telecommunications carriers, as is required by Sections 13-403, 13-404 and 13-405 of the Public Utilities Act. The Administrative
    Law Judge notes that in the Joint Petition, several Sprint entities are listed as Petitioners, however, it appears that only one of those Sprint entities has a current certificate from this
    Commission to act as a telecommunications carrier.
    Notice is also given by the Administrative Law Judge that the parties are directed to, on or before December 19, 2005, either file and serve an amended petition with the correct names of the parties (the name or names on current ICC certificates of service authority), or to file and
    serve a verified response to this Rule to Show Cause Order, stating why the Sprint entities in
    the interconnection agreements are not currently certificated by this Commission. Attached to
    this verified response must be all pertinent documents, including, if relevant, any documents
    issued by the Ill. Secretary of State.
    To and including December 19, 2005, the parties are given leave to file an amended Petition. Failure or untimely response to this ruling could result in dismissal. Parties served electronically.
  • 12/12/2005
    Filing - Petition/Application

    Joint Petition for Approval of Negotiated Traffic Termination Agreement between The El Paso Telephone Company and Sprint Spectrum L.P. and other Sprint Entities, filed by Meyer Capel, a Professional Corporation. (Electronic)