e-Docket

Menu

Subscribe to this case.

Entries

  • Hearing
    Pre-Hearing Conference.
    12-0372 · 07/09/2012 11:00 AM
  • Hearing
    NO HEARING - CANCELLED & CONTINUED TO 10/02/12 @ 11AM.
    12-0372 · 08/16/2012 10:00 AM
  • Hearing
    STATUS. NO HEARING - CONTINUED TO 11/20/12 @ 11:30AM.
    12-0372 · 10/02/2012 11:00 AM
  • Motion
    That Complainant's objection, if any, to Respondent's motion to implead Illinois Bell, is due by August 31, 2012.
    12-0372 · 08/31/2012 5:00 PM
  • Responses to Motion
    ComEd’s response to the Verified Objection of AT&T Illinois to Motion to Implead or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss Complaint, is due no later than September 7, 2012.
    12-0372 · 09/07/2012 5:00 PM
  • Ruling
    Please send the following notice of Administrative Law Judge’s ruling in Docket 12-0372, Dillon v. ComEd: “Complainant Patrick Dillon’s response to Respondent’s Motion to Implead AT&T and his response to AT&T’s Objection to the Motion to Implead are due no later than September 21, 2012.”
    12-0372 · 08/31/2012 1:21 PM
  • Responses to Motion
    Complainant Patrick Dillon’s response to Respondent’s Motion to Implead AT&T and his response to AT&T’s Objection to the Motion to Implead are due no later than September 21, 2012.”
    12-0372 · 09/21/2012 5:00 PM
  • Hearing
    NO HEARING - CONTINUED TO 1/10/13 @ 11AM.
    12-0372 · 11/20/2012 11:30 AM
  • Ruling
    Commonwealth Edison Company’s Motion to Implead AT&T as a Respondent and for Other Relief is denied.
    12-0372 · 10/02/2012 11:00 AM
  • Ruling
    Respondent’s Motion to Implead AT&T as a Respondent and for Other Relief is denied. AT&T’s Motion to Dismiss contained in its Verified Objection of AT&T Illinois to Implead or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss Complaint, is moot.
    12-0372 · 11/14/2012 3:00 PM
  • Ruling
    Complainant’s response to the Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondent is due no later than November 30, 2012. Any reply by the Respondent thereafter is due no later than December 7, 2012.
    12-0372 · 11/16/2012 1:38 PM
  • Responses to Motion
    Complainant’s response to the Motion to Dismiss filed by Respondent is due no later than November 30, 2012.
    12-0372 · 11/30/2012 5:00 PM
  • Replies to Response
    Any reply by the Respondent thereafter is due no later than December 7, 2012.
    12-0372 · 12/07/2012 5:00 PM
  • Ruling
    “Complainant’s Reply to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss and Other Relief must be verified and must be filed with the Office of the Chief Clerk of the Commission. Complainant’s response must also contain the name of the Docket, Patrick Dillon v. Commonwealth Edison Company, and the Docket number, 12-0372, in the caption to the Reply.”
    12-0372 · 11/20/2012 4:00 PM
  • Ruling
    Commonwealth Edison Company’s Motion to Implead AT&T as a Respondent and for Other Relief is denied.
    12-0372 · 11/20/2012 11:30 AM
  • Hearing
    Evidentiary Hearing. HEARD & TAKEN. EXHIBIT ADMITTED IN HARD COPY: [Complainant’s Exhibits: 1. 92 Ill. Adm. Code Ch. I, subchapter f; 2. IDOT Highway Jurisdiction Guidelines; 3. Photos of utility pole, driveway, alley and Berwyn Ave.] [Respondent’s Exhibits: 1. Photos of utility pole, driveway, alley and Berwyn Ave.; 2. Situation Sketch; 3. ComEd letter to Complainant 4/4/12; 4. Ill.C.C. No. 10 2nd Revised Sheet No. 154; 5. Maintenance Designations; 7. Ill.C.C. No. 10 Original Sheet No. 277; 8. Ill.C.C. No. 10 Original Sheet No. 156;]
    12-0372 · 01/10/2013 11:00 AM
  • Ruling
    Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss and Other Relief is denied. Please state in the notice that this matter will proceed to evidentiary hearing on January 10, 2013 @11:00 am, and that Complainant will be required to proceed first and produce all testimony, documents and other evidence relevant to the complaint.
    12-0372 · 01/02/2013 11:30 AM
  • Ruling
    Respondent is directed to file late-filed Exhibit 6, Franchise Agreement, with the Office of the Chief Clerk instanter. Copies shall also be provided to the Complainant and to the Administrative Law Judge. Complainant shall have ten days from the date late-filed Exhibit 6 posts on the Commission’s e-Docket system in which to file an objection. Respondent shall have five days from the date the objection is filed to reply.
    12-0372 · 02/22/2013 10:18 AM
  • Ruling
    “Respondent’s reply to Complainant’s objection to the admission of Complainant’s late-filed Exhibit 6 shall be filed no later than March 29, 2013.”
    12-0372 · 03/19/2013 4:30 PM
  • Deadline
    “Respondent’s reply to Complainant’s objection to the admission of Complainant’s late-filed Exhibit 6 shall be filed no later than March 29, 2013.”
    12-0372 · 03/29/2013 5:00 PM
  • Ruling
    Please send an ALJ ruling stating that Respondent’s late-filed Exhibit 6 is admitted into evidence over Complainant’s written objection; please add that the concluding paragraph of Complainant’s objection does not address the motion to admit late-filed Exhibit 6 and will not be considered by the ALJ.
    12-0372 · 03/28/2013 10:00 AM

  •  
     

Notes

  • If you add a shortcut to your browser, you may revist this report anytime you wish.
  • To receive any updates to this query, you may subscribe to the RSS feed.